Indian slavery in colonial times within the present limits of the United StatesLauber, Almon Wheeler
History
Indian slavery in colonial times within the present limits of the United States
Lauber, Almon Wheeler
Indians of North America; Indians, Treatment of -- United States; Slavery -- United States; Thesis (Ph. D.)
Not only were the Indians who themselves engaged in the war sold as
slaves at home and abroad, but the wives and children of the captive
males were also seized and consigned to slavery. In 1677, the
Massachusetts general court ordered that the Indian children, boys and
girls, whose parents had been in hostility with the colony or had lived
among its enemies in the time of the war, and who were taken by force
and given or sold to any of the inhabitants of the colony, should be at
the disposal of their masters or their assignees.[465] In the case of a
certain Praying Indian, who withdrew from the English side and joined
the Indian enemy, not only himself, but his wife and children were
taken prisoners and held as slaves until redeemed by Eliot.[466] The
same policy was followed in Plymouth. A case in point is that of the
chief, Popanooie, whose wife and children were retained in the colony
as slaves, while he himself was transported and sold into slavery.[467]
Both Plymouth and Massachusetts made a distinction between the
children of those Indian enemies who were taken by force, and those
who voluntarily gave themselves up to the colonial authorities. The
children of the latter were to serve as slaves only until twenty-four
years of age. The term of service of the former was not specified.[468]
Neither Rhode Island nor Connecticut transported Indian slaves to
the West Indies. Both colonies, however, retained Indian captives
of King Philip’s War, but only for limited periods of time, not for
life. During the war numerous bands of the Indians surrendered to
the English at Providence and Newport. The sentiment of the colony
against enslaving Indians, here, as in Connecticut, the result of
Quaker influence,[469] had already been shown. So, in accordance with
the spirit already expressed, it was voted by the town of Providence,
August 14, 1676, to appoint a committee of five persons to dispose
of the Indians there.[470] The town agreed to abide by the action of
the five men.[471] The committee decided to sell the Indians in the
colony for a term of years; one-half the proceeds of the sale to go to
the captors, and the other half to the public treasury. The length of
service was to depend upon the Indians’ ages. Those under five years
were to be simple bondsmen till thirty; all above five years, and under
ten, till thirty-eight; above ten and under fifteen, till twenty-seven;
above fifteen and under twenty, till twenty-six; such as were above
thirty, seven years. Several receipts signed by this committee show
that such sales occurred.[472] A few days before, the Rhode Island
companies had brought in forty-two Indian captives. These, and all
other Indian prisoners held at the time, were sold into service in the
colony for a period of nine years.[473] The Indians thus sentenced did
not become actual slaves according to the strictest interpretation of
the term, since the persons who acquired them purchased only their
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account