Indians of LouisianaInter-tribal Council of Louisiana
History
Indians of Louisiana
Inter-tribal Council of Louisiana
Indians of North America -- Louisiana
This tribe was living at a site a few miles above the present site of
New Orleans on the opposite side of the river when LaSalle first
encountered them in 1682. In 1699 they shared a village with the
Bayogoula north of their former settlement. Between 1682 and 1699 the
Mugulasha and the Quinipissa joined together. The chief of the
Quinipissa in 1682, when the French first entered the territory, also
served as the chief of the Mugulasha in 1699. In May, 1700 they were
attacked by their fellow villagers, the Bayogoula, and were almost
completely destroyed. Survivors probably united with the Bayogoula or
Houma.
_Okelousa_—
In 1541 the Spaniards described them as a tribe “of more than ninety
villagers not subject to anyone, with a very warlike people and much
dreaded”, occupying a fertile land.
In 1682 they appear as allies of the Houma in the destruction of a
Tangipahoa village on the east bank of the Mississippi River. They were
a wandering people living west of the river on two little lakes to the
west of and above Point Coupee.
By the 18th century they were a small tribe living west of the lower
course of the Mississippi River. They evidently joined the Houma tribe
and ceased to exist as a distinct group.
_Quinipissa_—
This tribe was found by LaSalle in 1682 a _few miles above the present
site of New Orleans_, but on the _opposite side_ of the river. The
people received him with flights of arrows, and on his return used
peacemaking overtures as a mask for a treacherous but futile attack upon
his force. Four years later, Tonti made peace with this tribe. In 1699
Iberville hunted for them in vain, but later learned that they were
identical with the Mugulasha, then living with the Bayogoula about 20
leagues above their former settlement. According to Sauvolle, however,
the Quinipissa were not identical with the Mugulasha, but had united
with them. In any case, there can be no doubt that the _chief of the
Quinipissa in 1682 and 1686 was the same man as the chief of the
Mugulasha in 1699_.
In May, 1700, shortly after Iberville had visited them for the second
time, the Mugulasha were attacked and almost completely destroyed by
their fellow townsmen, the Bayogoula. The destruction was not as
complete probably as the French writers would have us believe, but we do
not hear of either Mugulasha or Quinipissa afterward, and the remnant
must have united with the Bayogoula or Houma, the latter having been
their allies.
_Tangipahoa_—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account