Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament — John Shaqi
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
At the present time this text of Erasmus is still disseminated by tens
and even hundreds of thousands by the British and Foreign Bible
Society of London. To this day the word ἀκαθάρτητος is printed in
their editions at Apoc. xvii. 4, though there is no such word in the
Greek language as ἀκαθάρτης, meaning uncleanness. In the concluding
verses of the New Testament, which were retranslated by Erasmus from
his Latin Bible, there stands the lovely future ἀφαιρήσει for ἀφελεῖ.
We find also constructions like οὐκ ἔστι, καίπερ ἐστίν, in c. xvii. 8,
where, however, the accentuation ἐστίν makes Erasmus responsible for
an additional error he did not commit, seeing that he at least printed
ἔστιν. Every college lad knows that καίπερ is construed with the
participle, though it is not perhaps every one that will see just at
once that καὶ πάρεστι is the correct reading. [_Cf._ Mark xv. 6, where
the MSS. fluctuate in like manner between ὃν παρῃτοῦντο and ὅνπερ
ᾒτοῦντο (ΟΝΠΑΡΗΤΟΥΝΤΟ.)] Other instances where the Textus Receptus has
adopted the reading of Erasmus in spite of the fact that it is
unsupported by any known MS. are to be found, _e.g._ in 1 Pet. ii. 6
(καὶ περιέχει) and in 2 Cor. i. 6. Luther, who used Erasmus’s second
edition of 1519, followed him in saying of the Beast, “that is not
although it is.” This, however, is not so remarkable as that in the
year 1883 such things were still allowed to stand in the first
impression of the Revised Version of Luther’s Bible issued by the
Conference of German Evangelical Churches, and only removed in their
last Revision of 1892. The error in Apoc. xvii. 8 was copied into the
English Authorised Version of 1611 (“is not and yet is”) but was
corrected by the Revisers of 1884 (“is not and shall come”).
Footnote 6:
Facsimile in Schaff’s _Companion_.
Footnote 7:
Facsimile in Schaff’s _Companion_.
Footnote 8:
Facsimiles of Folio 1598 and Octavo 1604 in Schaff’s _Companion_.
Footnote 9:
Copies of the Parisian Polyglot now cost about £6.
Footnote 10:
Facsimile in Schaffs’s _Companion_.
Footnote 11:
Facsimile in Schaff’s _Companion_.
Footnote 12:
Facsimile in Schaff’s _Companion_.
Footnote 13:
Facsimile of the second edition, Halle and London, 1796, in Schaff’s
_Companion_.
Footnote 14:
Facsimile in Schaff’s _Companion_.
Footnote 15:
Facsimiles of the edition of 1841, and the octava maior 1872, in
Schaff’s _Companion_.
Footnote 16:
Facsimile in Schaff’s _Companion_.
Footnote 17:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account