Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
In the _Chronicon Paschale_ there is a note on the reading τρίτη for
ἕκτη in John xix. 14, to the following effect:—καθὼς τὰ ἀκριβῆ
βιβλία περιέχει _αὐτό τε τὸ ἰδιόχειρον τοῦ εὐαγγελιστοῦ_, ὅπερ μέχρι
τοῦ νῦν πεφύλακται χάριτι θεοῦ ἐν τῇ Ἐφεσίων ἁγιωτάτῃ ἐκκλησίᾳ καὶ
ὑπὸ τῶν πιστῶν ἐκεῖσε προσκυνεῖται. Bengel himself said on 1 John v.
7:—“Et tamen etiam atque etiam sperare licet, si non autographum
Johanneum, at alios vetustissimos codices graecos, qui hanc
periocham habeant, in occultis providentiae divinae forulis adhuc
latentes, suo tempore productum iri.” (N.T. 420, 602, 770.)
In disproof of an alleged autograph of Peter, see Lagarde, _Aus dem
deutschen Gelehrtenleben_, Göttingen, 1880, p. 117 f. On legends of
this sort among the Polish Jews, on the autograph copy of the
Proverbs that Solomon sent to the Queen of Sheba, and now in the
possession of the Queen of England, etc., _vide_ S. Schechter, _Die
Hebraica in der Bibliothek des Britischen Museums_, in the
_Jüdisches Literatur-Blatt_ for 1888, No. 46.
At the Sixth Ecumenical Council of 680-1, which Harnack (_DG._ ii.
408) says might be called the “Council of Antiquaries and
Palaeographers”, investigations were instituted in this department
with some success.
J. G. Berger, _De Autographis Veterum_, Vitenb., 1723. 4^o.
J. R. Harris, _New Testament Autographs_ (Supplement to the
_American Journal of Philology_, No. 12), Baltimore, 1882. With
three plates.
In this connection reference might be made to the falsifications of
Constantine Simonides: _Facsimiles of certain portions of the Gospel
of St. Matthew, and of the Epistles of St. James and St. Jude,
written on papyrus of the first century_. London, 1862. Fol.
[Sidenote: Manuscripts.]
Seeing, then, that the autographs of the New Testament books have all
perished, we have to do as in the case of the Greek and Latin classics,
viz. apply to later copies of them, the so-called =manuscripts= of which
frequent mention has already been made. But while in the case of most
literary products of antiquity these manuscript copies are the _only_
sources whence we may derive our knowledge of them, we are happily more
fortunate in regard to the New Testament.
[Sidenote: Versions.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account