Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
second enlarged edition, 1900; F. Carta, C. Cipolla e C. Frati,
_Monumenta Palaeographica sacra: Atlante paleografico-artistico
composto sui manuscritti_, Turin, 1899; Karl Dziatzko,
_Untersuchungen über ausgewählte Kapitel des antiken Buchwesens. Mit
Text, Uebersetzung und Erklärung von Plinii Histor. Nat._, lib.
xiii. § 68, 69, Leipzig, Teubner, 1900.
1. MANUSCRIPTS.
[Sidenote: Number of manuscripts.]
For no literary production of antiquity is there such a wealth of
manuscripts as for the New Testament. Our classical scholars would
rejoice were they as fortunate with Homer or Sophocles, Plato or
Aristotle, Cicero or Tacitus, as Bible students are with their New
Testament. The oldest complete manuscript of Homer that we have dates
from the thirteenth century, and only separate papyrus fragments go back
to the Alexandrian age. All that is extant of Sophocles we owe to a
single manuscript dating from the eighth or ninth century in the
Laurentian Library at Florence. But of the New Testament, 3829
manuscripts have been catalogued up till the present. A systematic
search in the libraries of Europe might add still more to the list; a
search in those of Asia and Egypt would certainly do so. Gregory
believes that there are probably some two or three thousand manuscripts
which have not yet been collated, and every year additional manuscripts
are brought to light. Most of these are, of course, late, and contain
only separate portions, some of them mere fragments, of the New
Testament.[20] Not a few, however, go much further back than our
manuscripts of the Hebrew Old Testament and most of the Greek and Latin
Classics. Only in the case of the Mohammedan sacred books is the
condition of things more favourable. These came into existence in the
seventh century, and the variations between separate manuscripts are a
vanishing quantity, because the text of the Koran was officially fixed
at a very early date and regarded as inviolably sacred. Fortunately, one
might almost say, it is quite different with the New Testament, which
was put together in a totally different way. In its case the very
greatest freedom prevailed for at least a century and a half.
The manuscripts of the New Testament being so numerous, it becomes
necessary to arrange them. One of the most important considerations
hitherto has been that of age, and therefore manuscripts have been
divided into =Uncials= (or Majuscules) and =Cursives= (or Minuscules),
according to the style of writing in use at earlier or later times.
[Sidenote: Uncial, and Cursive script.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account