Investigation of Communist activities in Seattle, Wash., area. Hearings, Part 3United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities
History
Investigation of Communist activities in Seattle, Wash., area. Hearings, Part 3
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities
Communism -- Washington (State) -- Seattle
Important offices and many local offices of the Washington Pension
Union have been held by Communist Party members, and the activities
and policies of the pension union have always been supported by the
Communist Party. Many issues have been brought into the pension
union by the Communist Party and gained wide support by so doing.
The Communist Party in this district viewed the Washington Pension
Union as really its most important single front organization. It is
called mass organization by the Communist Party. They don’t use the
term “front organization.” They call it a mass organization. It was
the largest and most influential and second only to the Washington
Commonwealth Federation, which was a federation of organizations,
and the Washington Pension Union was an affiliate of the Washington
Commonwealth Federation, in which the Communist Party likewise had
a dominating influence.
I think I should read a little further. Mrs. Hartle also testified
that----
Mr. O’CONNELL. May I say I had no connection; I was not an
officer of the Washington Pension Union.
Mr. TAVENNER. I was going to discuss that question, whether or
not you were affiliated in any way with the Washington Pension Union.
Mr. O’CONNELL. I think as executive secretary of the
Democratic Party and as executive secretary of the Progressive Party I
made speeches to State conventions of the Washington Pension Union, as
did practically all the political leaders of the State of Washington,
regardless of the party.
I think during a period after my employment as executive secretary of
the Democratic Party at the request of a local in Everett I was sent
there to make a speech and I think I was--I am pretty sure I was paid
expenses and I may have been paid a fee for the speech I made to the
group at Everett at that time.
Mr. TAVENNER. Was that a convention of the Washington Pension
Union?
Mr. O’CONNELL. No, as I remember it, the Everett meeting was
some kind of a large local meeting that they had, some kind of an event
or celebration or something of that kind that I spoke at. It is hard to
recollect. It is a long time ago and I have made a lot of speeches all
over the State of Washington in those years and to a lot of groups.
Mr. TAVENNER. Did you work closely with the leadership of the
union in the political positions that you held, first, as secretary of
the State Democratic Party and later as secretary of the Progressive
Party?
Mr. O’CONNELL. I don’t know if you would say I worked closely.
We were naturally anxious in both the Democratic Party and in the
Progressive Party to get the votes of the senior citizens of the State
of Washington, and the only pension organization, the only senior
citizens organization at that particular time anyway I can remember was
the Washington Pension Union.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account