Investigation of Communist activities in Seattle, Wash., area. Hearings, Part 3United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities
History
Investigation of Communist activities in Seattle, Wash., area. Hearings, Part 3
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities
Communism -- Washington (State) -- Seattle
Mr. VELDE. Isn’t it true, also, that Mr. Rabbitt appeared in
executive session in June 1954 and refused to answer questions relating
to his membership in the Communist Party and other activities along
that line, relying on the fifth amendment?
Mr. TAVENNER. That is correct, sir.
Mr. O’Connell, did you confer with William Pennock and Tom Rabbitt or
any of the other leaders of the Washington Pension Union regarding its
organization, its policies, or any phases of its work?
Mr. O’CONNELL. In view of the prefatory statements made by you
and by Congressman Velde, and particularly with respect to the fact
that you state that Rabbitt and Pennock were members of the district
board of the Communist Party----
Mr. VELDE. Just a minute. I didn’t state that. I said two
witnesses had testified that he was a member of the Communist Party.
Mr. O’CONNELL. I see. I want to protect myself. I don’t know
whether I can safely answer that question now.
Mr. VELDE. What was the question?
Mr. TAVENNER. Read the question, please.
(The reporter read from his notes as requested.)
Mr. O’CONNELL. That is a real difficult one for me to answer.
As executive secretary of the Democratic Party, I probably, of course,
suggested things they might do to help us in the campaign and so on.
I don’t know, but I certainly--what I want to do--what I did was not
because they were members of the district board of the Communist
Party or because they were Communists, or anything of that kind. If
I suggested something they ought to do about the Washington Pension
Union either to Pennock or Rabbitt, it was in connection with either
Democratic Party activity or Progressive Party activity as far as
campaigns were concerned.
It is a very broad general question. You asked me about it, any phases
of its work. For instance, I mean we were certainly anxious in the
Democratic Party and Progressive Party, too, to get the votes of the
senior citizens of the State and----
Mr. TAVENNER. What do you mean by the “senior citizens”?
Mr. O’CONNELL. The older people of the State that were in the
pension organization, and so on. And outside the organization as well
that they had influence on.
Mr. TAVENNER. Were your discussions with the leadership of the
Washington Pension Union chiefly with Pennock and Rabbitt?
Mr. O’CONNELL. Well, during my time out there I think the
Washington Pension Union, if I remember correctly, had a whole host of
vice presidents, I don’t know how many, I think they elected--I think
Rabbitt was one of those vice presidents. But the executive officer of
the Washington Pension Union of course was Pennock and in my work as
executive secretary of the Democratic Party and also the Progressive
Party I certainly conferred with Pennock, I certainly asked him to see
that things were done by the campaign and see that work was done in
connection with it.
But in my time out there I think, I don’t think Rabbitt was any kind
of--was he a full-time paid employee of the Pension Union?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account