Investigation of Communist activities in Seattle, Wash., area. Hearings, Part 3United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities
History
Investigation of Communist activities in Seattle, Wash., area. Hearings, Part 3
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities
Communism -- Washington (State) -- Seattle
Mr. TAVENNER. Gardner Jackson is alleged to have written a
letter on August 3, 1946, to James G. Patton, president of the National
Farmers Union. Mr. Lem Harris admitted that he had seen a copy of that
letter when he testified before this committee. In this letter to Mr.
Patton, Gardner Jackson makes this statement:
I don’t have to tell you that many of us understand your
appointment of the pathetic Communist or pro-Communist boy Phil
Reno to your headquarters staff in Denver as political and labor
relations official was at the behest of George Marshall and Lem
Harris, the Communist Party’s avowed agricultural policy fellow,
in order to insure a continuing flow of money from the Marshall
Foundation to the National Farmers Union.
Doesn’t that prove to you the influence that was exerted by the
Communist Party upon awards made to the National Farmers Union?
Mr. O’CONNELL. That, of course, is a statement made by Gardner
Jackson, I think after he had been removed from his position with the
Farmers Union, and in which he supplied information to Senator Bridges,
I think, and I can’t remember others, but what influence--for instance
I don’t even know who Phil Reno is, don’t know anything about him, and
what Jackson is attempting there I don’t know.
Mr. TAVENNER. You had a responsibility as one of the trustees
to know how the awards were being paid.
Mr. O’CONNELL. That is right and, as a matter of fact, the
foundation called Patton before it because we got in disagreement with
him about the way the funds were being expended and from then on grants
were made to the various State organizations of the Farmers Union
rather than to the national office directly.
Mr. TAVENNER. But they were continued?
Mr. O’CONNELL. Well, they were actually made to different
State farm union organizations but not to the National Farmers Union,
not to Patton. And certainly one of the basic reasons was because of
this gigantic proposal that he had about establishing these branch
centers. We just didn’t think it was a wise expenditure of the
foundation’s funds, and so on, and that was some of the disagreement
that we had.
Mr. TAVENNER. Did you ever see a copy of the letter which I
referred to?
Mr. O’CONNELL. No; I never did.
Mr. TAVENNER. Had you heard of it?
Mr. O’CONNELL. I think the way I heard of it, I don’t know
whether this is the same letter, but Senator Bridges made a speech on
the floor of the Senate I think in 1950 in which I am pretty sure he
quoted or actually inserted the Gardner Jackson letter, if I remember,
and I think I read it within Senator Bridges remarks at that time that
were on the floor.
Now, I remember that there was quite a to-do about it. I was out in
the State of Montana at that time. I have been close. I have known
the Farm Union leadership and members out there and I know they were
exercised and committed and worried about this whole development.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account