Irish ImpressionsChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
History
Irish Impressions
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Ireland -- Civilization; Irish question
Now if we note this process going on in the world of London or
Liverpool, we shall see that it has already gone even farther and
fared even worse. The surname also is losing its root and therefore
its reason. The surname has become as solitary as a nickname. For it
might be argued that the first name is meant to be an individual and
even isolated thing; but the last name is certainly meant, by all
logic and history, to link a man with his human origins, habits, or
habitation. Historically, it was a word taken from the town he lived
in or the trade guild to which he belonged; legally it is still the
word on which all questions of legitimacy, succession, and testamentary
arrangements turn. It is meant to be the corporate name; in that sense
it is meant to be the impersonal name, as the other is meant to be the
personal name. Yet in the modern mode of industrialism, it is more and
more taken in a manner at once lonely and light. Any corporate social
system built upon it would seem as much of a joke as the joke about
Christian names with which I began. If it would seem odd to require a
Thomas to make friends with any other Thomas, it would appear almost as
perplexing to insist that any Thompson must love any other Thompson. It
may be that Sir Edward Henry, late of the Police Force, does not wish
to be confined to the society of Mr Edward Clodd. But would Sir Edward
Henry necessarily seek the society of Mr O. Henry, entertaining as that
society would be? Sir John Barker, founder of the great Kensington
emporium, need not specially seek out and embrace Mr John Masefield;
but need he, any more swiftly, precipitate himself into the arms of Mr
Granville Barker? This vista of varieties would lead us far; but it
is enough to notice, nonsense apart, that the most ordinary English
surnames have become unique in their social significance; they stand
for the man rather than the race or the origins. Even when they are
most common they are not communal. What we call the family name is not
now primarily the name of the family. The family itself, as a corporate
conception, has already faded into the background, and is in danger of
fading from the background. In short, our Christian names are not the
only Christian things that we may lose.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account