Irish ImpressionsChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
History
Irish Impressions
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Ireland -- Civilization; Irish question
Now of course every one knows that there is practically no such danger
of Celtic Imperialism. Mr Lloyd George will not attempt to annex
Brittany as a natural part of Britain. No Tories, however antiquated,
will extend their empire in the name of the True Blue of the Ancient
Britons. Nor is there the least likelihood that the Irish will overrun
Scotland on the plea of an Irish origin for the old name of the
Scots; or that they will set up an Irish capital at Stratford-on-Avon
merely because _avon_ is the Celtic word for water. That is the sort
of thing that Teutonic ethnologists do; but Celts are not quite so
stupid as that, even when they are ethnologists. It may be suggested
that this is because even prehistoric Celts seem to have been rather
more civilised than historic Teutons. And indeed I have seen ornaments
and utensils in the admirable Dublin museum, suggestive of a society
of immense antiquity, and much more advanced in the arts of life
than the Prussians were, only a few centuries ago. For instance,
there was something that looked like a sort of safety razor. I doubt
if the godlike Goths had much use for a razor; or if they had, if
it was altogether safe. Nor am I so dull as not to be stirred to an
imaginative sympathy with the instinct of modern Irish poetry to
praise this primordial and mysterious order, even as a sort of pagan
paradise; and that not as regarding a legend as a sort of lie, but a
tradition as a sort of truth. It is but another hint of a suggestion,
huge yet hidden, that civilisation is older than barbarism; and that
the farther we go back into pagan origins, the nearer we come to the
great Christian origin of the Fall. But whatever credit or sympathy
be due to the cult of Celtic origins in its proper place, it is none
of these things that really prevents Celticism from being a barbarous
imperialism like Teutonism. The thing that prevents imperialism is
nationalism. It was exactly because Germany was not a nation that it
desired more and more to be an empire. For a patriot is a sort of
lover, and a lover is a sort of artist; and the artist will always love
a shape too much to wish it to grow shapeless, even in order to grow
large. A group of Teutonic tribes will not care how many other tribes
they destroy or absorb; and Celtic tribes when they were heathen may
have acted, for all I know, in the same way. But the civilised Irish
nation, a part and product of Christendom, has certainly no desire to
be entangled with other tribes, or to have its outlines blurred with
great blots like Liverpool and Glasgow, as well as Belfast. In that
sense it is far too self-conscious to be selfish. Its individuality
may, as I shall suggest, make it too insular; it will not make it too
imperial. This is a merit in nationalism too little noted; that even
what is called its narrowness is not merely a barrier to invasion, but
a barrier to expansion. Therefore, with all respect to the prehistoric
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account