Irish ImpressionsChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
History
Irish Impressions
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Ireland -- Civilization; Irish question
the practical joke if he does not realise that the joker is a practical
man. On the desk in front of him as he spoke were business papers of
reports and statistics, much more concerned with fillets of veal than
fillets of vision. That is the essential fact about all this side of
such men in Ireland. We may think the Celtic ghost a turnip ghost; but
we can only doubt the reality of the ghost; there is no doubt of the
reality of the turnip.
But if the Celtic pose be a piece of the Celtic ornament, the spirit
that produced it does also produce some more serious tendencies to the
segregation of Ireland, one might almost say the secretion of Ireland.
In this sense it is true that there is too much separatism in Ireland.
I do not speak of separation from England, which, as I have said,
happened long ago in the only serious sense, and is a condition to
be assumed, not a conclusion to be avoided. Nor do I mean separation
from some federation of free states including England; for that is a
conclusion that could still be avoided with a little common sense and
common honesty in our own politics. I mean separation from Europe,
from the common Christian civilisation by whose law the nations live.
I would be understood as speaking here of exceptions rather than the
rule; for the rule is rather the other way. The Catholic religion, the
most fundamental fact in Ireland, is itself a permanent communication
with the Continent. So, as I have said, is the free peasantry which is
so often the economic expression of the same faith. Mr James Stephens,
himself a spiritually detached man of genius, told me with great
humour a story which is also at least a symbol. A Catholic priest,
after a convivial conversation and plenty of good wine, said to him
confidentially: “You ought to be a Catholic. You can be saved without
being a Catholic; but you can’t be Irish without being a Catholic.”
Nevertheless, the exceptions are large enough to be dangers; and
twice lately, I think, they have brought Ireland into danger. This
is the age of minorities; of groups that rule rather than represent.
And the two largest parties in Ireland, though more representative
than most parties in England, were too much affected, I fancy, by the
modern fashion, expressed in the world of fads by being Celtic rather
than Catholic. They were just a little too insular to accept the old
unconscious wave of Christendom; the Crusade. But the case was more
extraordinary than that. They were even too insular to appreciate,
not so much their own international needs, as their own international
importance. It may seem a strange paradox to say that both nationalist
parties underrated Ireland as a nation. It may seem a more startling
paradox to say that in this the most nationalist was the least
national. Yet I think I can explain, however roughly, what I mean by
saying that this is so.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account