Japanese Colour-Prints and Their Designers — John Shaqi
Japanese Colour-Prints and Their DesignersGookin, Frederick W.
History
Japanese Colour-Prints and Their Designers
Gookin, Frederick W.
Artists -- Japan; Color prints, Japanese; Color prints, Japanese -- Exhibitions
Fortunately, though the upper classes did not consider the prints as works
of art, that did not prevent them from buying them for the entertainment
they afforded. The samurai, though they considered it degrading to take
part in the amusements of the lower classes and affected to despise the
vulgarity of the theatre, sometimes attended the performances in disguise.
And when they returned to their home provinces with their feudal lords
after the six months of every year spent in the capital, they usually
carried with them large quantities of prints. Country people visiting Yedo
rarely returned without taking many of these cheap souvenirs of the city
to distribute among their neighbours. Of course many were destroyed, but
the Japanese have always been accustomed to take care of their
possessions, and so many thousands of prints were neatly packed away in
boxes and placed in the kuras, or fireproof storehouses. There they were
often spoiled by mildew, the dread foe of the Japanese housewife, and
eaten by insects. Those pasted in albums, as were many of the noted series
by Hokusai and Hiroshige, fared better than the loose ones.
[HARUNOBU. Woman reading Letter.]
HARUNOBU. Woman reading Letter.
Thus it has come about that in spite of the enormous number printed,
really choice specimens are very rare. Of many of the most important only
two or three copies in good condition are known. Even at the time of their
issue the number of those in what may be called the “proof” state could
not have been large. The best printing, as has already been pointed out,
was not only difficult and relatively expensive—perhaps prohibitively
expensive in many instances except for a small number of impressions—but
when the blocks had worn so that the edges of the finest lines had lost
their sharpness, it was quite impossible. Collections of prints were
rarely made. Literary men often saved such as were inscribed with odes of
especial merit, or had recondite meanings that appealed to them, and to
their care we are indebted for the preservation of the majority of those
that have survived in perfect or nearly perfect condition.
For those who have learned the elements of their language the charm of the
prints is very great. I should perhaps say the charm of some of the prints
is very great; for, as we learn what we ought to admire, we learn to
discriminate, at first between the works of the different artists, then
between different works by the same artist, and finally between different
copies of the same work. The truth is that the prints are only in a remote
sense to be spoken of as reproductions. Each impression is more or less an
individual work of art; the difference in quality between one and another
is often astonishingly wide.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account