Journals of Conrad Weiser (1748), George Croghan (1750-1765), Christian Frederick Post (1758), and Thomas Morris (1764)Croghan, George
History
Journals of Conrad Weiser (1748), George Croghan (1750-1765), Christian Frederick Post (1758), and Thomas Morris (1764)
Croghan, George
Mississippi River Valley -- Description and travel; United States -- Description and travel; West (U.S.) -- Description and travel
[69] Rogers in his _Journal_ places this meeting with the Ottawas on the
seventh instead of the fifth of November, and locates it at “Chogage”
River (formerly supposed to be Cuyahoga, but now thought to be Grand
River). Croghan’s account is more detailed, and probably written at the
time; while Rogers’s was written or revised later. “Wajea Sipery” is
probably Ashtabula Creek, which is sufficiently crooked in its course to
make this name appropriate. This is the traditional meeting for the first
time, with Pontiac, the Ottawa chief. Parkman’s well-known account of
the haughty bearing and dignified demands of this great Indian contrast
markedly with Croghan’s simpler and more literal account. In truth, it
may be doubted whether this chief was Pontiac at all, as he here speaks
of himself as an old man. Rogers’s _Journal_ makes no mention of any
chief, and alludes but incidentally to meeting the Ottawa band; but in
his _Concise Account of North America_, published in London (1765), when
the exploits of Pontiac were causing much attention, Rogers represents
himself as having encountered that chief on his way to Detroit, and
that the latter asked him how he dared to enter that country without
his (Pontiac’s) leave. This was probably a flight of the imagination,
consequent upon his representing the Indian chief as the hero of the
tragedy in the verses he was then preparing, known as _Ponteach, or the
Savages of America_ (London, 1766). See Parkman, _Conspiracy of Pontiac_,
i, p. 165, ii, appendix B. The plain, unadorned account of Croghan, and
the begging attitude of the Ottawa chief, are probably more in accordance
with historical verity than Parkman’s and Rogers’s more romantic
accounts.—ED.
[70] The creek which Croghan calls “Onchuago” was Grand River, whose
Indian name was “Chaeaga” (Sheauga), and which is thus designated on
Evans’s map of 1755, and Hutchins’s map of 1778. Whittlesey, _Early
History of Cleveland_ (Cleveland, 1867), thus identifies this stream.
Baldwin, in his “Early Maps of Ohio and the West,” Western Reserve
Historical Society _Tracts_, No. 25, thinks it is the Conneaut Creek;
but that would be too far east to correspond with this description, and
the present Geauga County takes its title from the Indian name of Grand
River.—ED.
[71] Lieutenant Dietrich Brehm (Braam) was a German engineer who came
to America in 1756 with the 32nd regiment (later the 60th or Royal
Americans). Little is known of his military career, save that in the line
of promotion he was captain in 1774, and major in 1783.—ED.
[72] Probably “Gichawaga” was Cuyahoga River, the site of the city of
Cleveland, and a well-known rendezvous of the Ottawa Indians, who had
a village some miles up its banks. Rogers speaks of it as Elk River,
which by some geographers is placed east of Cuyahoga River; but Rogers’s
list of distances, allowing for much tacking, would indicate that the
expedition had by this time certainly come as far beyond Grand River as
Cuyahoga.—ED.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account