King Arthur in history and legendJones, William Lewis
History
King Arthur in history and legend
Jones, William Lewis
Arthur, King; Arthurian romances -- History and criticism
Among the marvellous objects described are Arthur’s sword and mantle
(called Gwenn), but the story-teller does not let his fancy play around
them so freely as around most of the things he depicts. The sword was
in the keeping of “Kadwr, earl of Cornwall,” whose duty it was to “arm
the king on the days of battle.” “And the similitude of two serpents
was upon the sword in gold. And when it was drawn from its scabbard, it
seemed as if two flames of fire burst forth from the jaws of serpents.”
Gwenn, the mantle, was “of diapered satin” with “an apple of ruddy gold
at each corner thereof,” and “it was one of its properties that upon
whomsoever it was put, he became lost to sight though he himself could
see every one.” Arthur himself is, in this tale, constantly referred to
as “the Emperor,” and he is first met with “sitting on a flat island”
below the Ford of the Cross on the Severn, “with Bedwini the Bishop on
one side of him, and Gwarthegydd, the son of Kaw, on the other.” Among
his retainers are his “cousin” March (or Mark), the son of Meirchion,
prince of “the men of Norway”; Edern, the son of Nudd, prince of “the
men of Denmark”; Kai, “the fairest horseman in all Arthur’s Court”;
and a host of others, many of whose names appear in the long catalogue
given in _Kulhwch and Olwen_. Some of these names, such as Tristan, the
son of Tallwch, and Peredur of the Long Lance, bring us into touch with
the later developments of Arthurian romance.
The other three _Mabinogion_, so called, in which Arthur figures,--_The
Lady of the Fountain_, _Geraint_, and _Peredur_,--will be noticed in
a subsequent chapter, for these stories, whether they were directly
based upon French originals or not, palpably belong to a period when
the Arthurian legends had been, or were being, exploited for romantic
purposes by French writers. The natural transition from such stories
as _Kulhwch and Olwen_ is to the Welsh Triads, the oldest group of
which certainly contain traditions about Arthur as archaic as anything
to be found in either the poems or the prose tales already reviewed.
Here, only a few of the more significant allusions to Arthur contained
in them need be quoted. Arthur is first mentioned in connection with
Medraut’s, or Modred’s, treachery, and he is described--much as in
Geoffrey’s Chronicle--as conducting a victorious campaign against the
Romans. The final battle with the Romans, of which Geoffrey gives so
elaborate an account, is said to take place “beyond Mount Mynneu,”
and in it Arthur encounters, and slays with his own hand, the Roman
Emperor himself.[62] Modred, who had been left in charge of Britain,
hearing of the grievous slaughter of Arthur’s “best men” in this
battle, revolts. Arthur returns, “and then took place the battle of
Camlan between Arthur and Medraut, when Arthur slew Medraut, and Arthur
himself was mortally wounded; and _he was buried in a palace in the
isle of Avallach_.” In another Triad, Arthur is made responsible for
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account