No Companion so well deserved the honor conferred upon him as he who
was the most illustrious of the English knights created during the
sway of the successor of George III., as Regent; namely, the late Duke
of Wellington. Mr. Macaulay, when detailing the services and honors
conferred on Schomberg, has a passage in which he brings the names
of these two warriors, dukes, and knights of the Garter, together.
“The House of Commons had, with general approbation, compensated the
losses of Schomberg, and rewarded his services by a grant of a hundred
thousand pounds. Before he set out for Ireland, he requested permission
to express his gratitude for this magnificent present. A chair was set
for him within the bar. He took his seat there with the mace at his
right hand, rose, and in a few graceful words returned his thanks and
took his leave. The Speaker replied that the Commons could never forget
the obligation under which they already lay to his Grace, that they saw
him with pleasure at the head of an English army, that they felt entire
confidence in his zeal and ability, and that at whatever distance he
might be he would always be, in a peculiar manner, an object of their
care. The precedent set on this interesting occasion was followed with
the utmost minuteness, a hundred and twenty-five years later, on an
occasion more interesting still. Exactly on the same spot, on which, in
July, 1689, Schomberg had acknowledged the liberality of the nation,
a chair was set in July, 1814, for a still more illustrious warrior,
who came to return thanks for a still more splendid mark of public
gratitude.”
There is nothing calling for particular notice in the history of the
Order since the election of the last-named knight. Not one on whose
shoulders has been placed “the robe of heavenly color,” earned so
hardly and so well the honor of companionship. This honor, however,
costs every knight who submits to the demand, not less than one hundred
and eight pounds sterling, in fees. It is, in itself, a heavy fine
inflicted on those who render extraordinary service to the country, and
to whom are presented the order of the Garter, and an order from the
Garter King-at-arms to pay something more than a hundred guineas in
return. The fine, however, is generally paid with alacrity; for, though
the non-payment does not unmake a knight, it has the effect of keeping
his name from the register.
I have already observed that Mr. Macaulay, in his recently-published
History, has asserted that very few foreigners, except they were
sovereign princes, were ever admitted into the companionship of the
Garter. Let us, then, look over the roll of illustrious aliens, and see
how far this assertion is correct.
FOREIGN KNIGHTS OF THE GARTER.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive