Although Evelyn, in 1666, says that “never till now” were women
admitted to assume characters on the stage, he is not quite correct in
his assertion. There were actresses full thirty years previous to that
period. Thus, in 1632, the “Court Beggar” was acted at the Cockpit.
In the last act, Lady Strangelove says:--“If you have a short speech
or two, the boy’s a pretty actor, and his mother can play her part:
women-actors now grow in request.” Our ancestors wisely followed a
foreign fashion when they ceased to employ boys in female characters.
Prynne says, in 1633, “They have now their female players in Italy
and other foreign parts;” and in Michaelmas 1629, they had French
women-actors in a play personated at Blackfriars, to which there was
a great resort. Geneste quotes Freshwater as writing thus of French
actresses in Paris, in 1629: “Yet the women are the best actors; they
play their own parts, a thing much desired in England.”
In Davenant’s patent for opening Lincoln’s-inn Fields, in 1661,
permission was given for the engaging of women as actresses, on the
ground that the employment of men in such parts had given great
offence. I more particularly notice this matter, because it was a
knight who first opened a theatre with a regular female _troupe_
added to the usual number of male actors. Sir William’s ladies were
Mrs. Davenport, Mrs. Saunderson, Mrs. Davies, Mrs. Long, Mrs. Gibbs,
Mrs. Norris, Mrs. Holden, and Mrs. Jennings. The first four were Sir
William’s principal actresses, and these were boarded in the knight’s
own dwelling-house. Their title of “Mistress” does not necessarily
imply that they were married ladies, but rather that they were old
enough to be so.
This knight, too, was the first who introduced scenery on the stage. I
will add (_par parenthèse_) that it was a priest who first suggested
the levelling of the pit with the stage, for the purpose of masquerades
and balls.
Prynne was not among those who fancied that morality would profit
by the introduction of actresses. He had his misgivings as to the
effects likely to be produced on the susceptible young gallants of
his day. Touching the appearance of the French actresses at the
Blackfriars Theatre, noticed above, he calls it “an impudent, shameful,
un-womanish, graceless, if not more than w----ish attempt.” The fashion
was, undoubtedly, first set by the court, and by no less a person than
a queen. Anne of Denmark, wife of James I., acted a part in a pastoral.
They who remember some of the incidents of the training she gave her
son, the princely knight young Henry, will hardly think that Anne gave
dignity to the occupation she temporarily assumed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account