There are many instances in romance which would seem to imply, that so
strained was the sentiment which bound knights to respect ladies, it
compelled them not to depart therefrom even in extreme cases, involving
lightness of conduct and infidelity. The great northern chiefs,
who were a sort of very rough knights in their way, were, however,
completely under the distaff. Their wives could divorce themselves at
will. Thus, in Erysbiggia Saga we read of Borck, an Icelandic chief,
who, bringing home a guest whom his wife not only refused to welcome,
but attempted to stab, administered such correction to his spouse in
return, that the lady called in witnesses and divorced herself on the
spot. Thereupon the household goods were divided among them, and the
affair was rapidly and cheaply managed without the intervention of an
Ecclesiastical Court. More modern chivalry would not have tolerated the
idea of correcting even a faithless, much less a merely angry spouse.
Indeed, the amatory principle was quite as strong as the religious one;
and in illustration thereof, it has been remarked that the knight must
have been more than ordinarily devout who had God on his _right_ hand
(the place of honor), and his lady on his _left_.
To _ride at the ring_ was then the pleasantest pastime for knights; and
ladies looked on and applauded the success, or laughed at the failures.
The riding, without attempting to carry off the ring, is still common
enough at our fairs, for children; but in France and Germany, it is
seriously practised in both its simple and double forms, by persons
of all ages, who glide round to the grinding of an organ, and look as
grave as if they were on desperate business.
It is an undoubted matter of fact, that although a knight was bound to
be tender in his gallantry, there were some to be found whose wooing
was of the very roughest; and there were others who, if not rough, were
rascally.
The old Rue des Lombards, in Paris, was at one time occupied
exclusively by the “professed pourpoint-makers,” as a modern tailor
might say. They carried on a flourishing trade, especially in times
when men, like Bassompierre, thought nothing of paying, or promising to
pay, fourteen thousand crowns for a pourpoint. When I say the street
was thus occupied exclusively, I must notice an exception. There were a
few other residents in it, the Jew money-lenders or usurers; and when
I hear the old French proverb cited “patient as a Lombard,” I do not
know whether it originally applied to the tailors or the money-lenders,
both of whom were extensively cheated by their knightly customers. Here
is an illustration of it, showing that all Jessicas have not been as
lucky as Shylock’s daughter, and that some Jews have been more cruelly
treated than Shylock’s daughter’s father--whom I have always considered
as one of the most ill-used of men.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account