that the maxim was first published, which says, “_Ce que femme veut,
Dieu le veut!_”
This sentiment reminds me, that it is time to show how the knight was
affected by the tender passion, how it was sometimes his glory and
sometimes his shame. He was sometimes the victim, and at others the
victimizer.
LOVE IN CHEVALIERS, AND CHEVALIERS IN LOVE.
“How pleasing are the steps we lovers make,
When in the paths of our content we pace
To meet our longings!”--_The Hog hath Lost his Purse._
Butler, in his Hudibras (part iii. cant. 1), has amusingly illustrated
the feeling which moved knights-errant, and the particular object they
had in view: “the ancient errant knights,” he says:--
“Won all their ladies’ hearts in fights,
And cuts whole giants into fritters,
To put them into amorous twitters;
Whose stubborn bowels scorned to yield,
Until their gallants were half killed:
But when their bones were drubbed so sore
They durst not win one combat more,
The ladies’ hearts began to melt,
Subdued by blows their lovers felt.
So Spanish heroes with their lances
At once wound bulls and ladies’ fancies.”
However willing a knight may have been to do homage to his lady, the
latter, if she truly regarded the knight, never allowed his homage to
her to be paid at the cost of injury to his country’s honor or his
own. An instance of this is afforded us in the case of Bertrand de
Guesclin. There never was man who struck harder blows when he was a
bachelor; but when he went a wooing, and still more after he had wed
the incomparable Tiphania, he lost all care for honor in the field, and
had no delight but in the society of his spouse. The lady, however, was
resolved that neither his sword nor his reputation should acquire rust
through any fault or beauty of hers. She rallied him soundly on his
home-keeping propensities, set them in contrast with the activity of
his bachelor-days, and the renown acquired by it, and forthwith talked
him out of her bower and into his saddle.
The English did not profit by the lady’s eloquence, for our forefathers
never had a more gallant or more difficult adversary to deal with than
Bertrand. Living, his name was a terror to them; and dying, he had the
sympathy of those who had been his foes. Charles V. made him Constable
of France, and appointed him a grave at the foot of his own royal tomb.
De Guesclin would never have been half the man he was but for the good
sense of his wife Tiphania.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account