Russian literature -- 19th century -- History and criticism
“And there was there an herd of many swine feeding on the mountain;
and they besought Him that He would suffer them to enter into them.
And He suffered them. Then went the devils out of the man and entered
into the swine: and the herd ran violently down a steep place into the
lake and were choked. When they that fed them saw what was done, they
fled, and went and told it in the city and in the country.
“Then they went out to see what was done; and came to Jesus, and found
the man out of whom the devils were departed, sitting at the feet of
Jesus, clothed, and in his right mind; and they were afraid. They also
which saw it, told them by what means he that was possessed of the
devils, was healed.”
The book, as I have said, undoubtedly reveals Dostoievsky’s powers at
their highest pitch, in the sense that nowhere in the whole range of
his work do we find such isolated scenes of power; scenes which are, so
to speak, white hot with the fire of his soul; and characters in which
he has concentrated the whole dæmonic force of his personality, and the
whole blinding strength of his insight. On the other hand, it shows us,
as I added, more clearly than any other of his books, the nature and
the extent of his limitations. It is almost too full of characters and
incidents; the incidents are crowded together in an incredibly short
space of time, the whole action of the book, which is a remarkably long
one, occupying only the space of a few days, while to the description
of one morning enough space is allotted to make a bulky English novel.
Again, the narrative is somewhat disconnected. You can sometimes
scarcely see the wood for the trees. Of course, these objections are in
a sense hypercritical, because, as far as my experience goes, any one
who takes up this book finds it impossible to put it down until he has
read it to the very end, so enthralling is the mere interest of the
story, so powerful the grip of the characters. I therefore only suggest
these criticisms for those who wish to form an idea of the net result
of Dostoievsky’s artistic scope and achievement.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account