Langley Memoir on Mechanical Flight, Parts I and II: Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, Volume 27 Number 3, Publication 1948, 1911Langley, S. P. (Samuel Pierpont)
History
Langley Memoir on Mechanical Flight, Parts I and II: Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, Volume 27 Number 3, Publication 1948, 1911
Langley, S. P. (Samuel Pierpont)
Aeronautics; Flight
Point of Weight
application Absolute in terms Deflection
of weight weight in of in terms
in terms of grammes. greatest of length.
length. weight.
0.39 1050 1.0 .38
0.445 605 0.58 .38
0.56 405 0.39 .38
0.75 210 0.20 .38
0.95 77 0.075 .38
HOLLOW SPRUCE RIB.
Weight, 120 grammes; length 153 cm.; section, rectangular; tip, 17
cm. above butt.
Point of Weight
application Absolute in terms Deflection
of weight weight in of in terms
in terms of grammes. greatest of length.
length. weight.
0.39 15,000 1.0 .11
0.445 11,400 0.76 .11
0.56 7,900 0.53 .11
0.75 4,000 0.27 .11
0.95 2,000 0.135 .11
In each case the unit of length was the portion extending beyond the
clamp; the unit of weight, the greatest weight employed to produce
the deflection. It should be noted, however, that the relative
deflection was quite different in the two comparisons. In the case of
the quill the deflection was 17 cm. in 45 cm., or 38 per cent; in the
case of the rib it was 17 cm. in 153 cm., or 11 per cent. In the case
of the rib at the point 0.39 the absolute weight was 15,000 grammes,
the relative weight unity and the deflection in terms of length 0.11.
While no rigorous comparison can be instituted, since the rib was
not deflected nearly as much proportionately as the quill, yet the
general inference is that while the rib was not intended to be, and
was not as elastic proportionately as the quill, it was probably at
least as strong in proportion to its weight. Briefly summarizing
these results it will be noted that the spruce rib was about 3.3
times the length and 30 times as heavy, while it was 15 times as
stiff near the butt and 26 times as stiff at the tip, as the quill.
As this test on the rib for the large wings had apparently shown
that the plan of constructing the ribs in the form of a hollow
square secured maximum strength for minimum weight, it was decided
to construct a few sample ribs after the same plan for the wings of
the new quarter-size model of the large aerodrome, and to test, these
ribs in a similar manner. The following table shows the results of
the test on one of these ribs:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account