Lead Smelting and Refining, With Some Notes on Lead Mining
Science
Lead Smelting and Refining, With Some Notes on Lead Mining
Lead -- Metallurgy; Lead mines and mining
I was exceedingly skeptical about pyritic smelting as advocated by
some of your correspondents, and still continue to be so; but on
making inquiries from some of my co-workers in this line, Mr. Sticht
of Tasmania, and Mr. Nutting of Bingham, Utah, I have arrived at the
following conclusion, to which some may take exception: That pyritic
smelting without fuel, or with less than 5 per cent., with hot
blast, is practically impossible; that smelting raw ore with a low
charge burden to avoid the reducing action of the carbon monoxide,
thereby securing oxidation of the iron and sulphur, is possible and
practicable, under favorable conditions; and that a large portion of
the sulphur is burned off, and the iron, without reducing action,
goes into the slag in combination with silica. These results can be
obtained with cold blast.
A blowing engine would certainly be much out of place for operating
copper-matting furnaces run with the evident intention of oxidizing
sulphur and iron and securing as high a grade of matte as possible,
for the reason that to do this it is necessary to run a low charge
burden, and with a low charge burden a high pressure of blast cannot
be maintained. With a 4 to 6 ft. charge burden the blast pressure at
Victoria Mines at present is 3 oz., produced by a No. 6 Green blower
run at 120 r.p.m.; and a blowing engine, delivering the same amount
of air, would certainly not give more pressure. Under the conditions
which we have, a fan would be more effective than a pressure blower,
and a blowing engine entirely out of the question as far as economy is
concerned.
I installed blowing engines at the East Helena for lead smelting where
the charge burden was 21 ft. and the blast pressure at times went up
as high as 48 oz. Under these conditions the blowing engines gave
satisfaction, but I am of the opinion that the same amount of blast
could have been obtained under that pressure with less horse-power by
the best type of rotary blower. I do not believe that the field of
the blowing engine properly exists below 5 lb., and if this pressure
cannot be obtained by charge-burden conditions, their installation is a
mistake.
I wish to add the very evident fact that varying the grade of the matte
by feeding the furnace at different hights varies the slag composition
as to its silica and iron contents and makes the feeder the real
metallurgist. The reducing action in the furnace is effected almost
entirely by the gases, and when these are allowed to go to waste,
reduction ceases.
BLOWING ENGINES AND ROTARY BLOWERS—HOT BLAST FOR PYRITIC SMELTING
BY S. E. BRETHERTON
(August 24, 1901)
I have just read in the _Engineering and Mining Journal_ of July 20th
an interesting letter written by Hiram W. Hixon in regard to blowing
engines versus the rotary blowers, and also the use of cold blast for
pyritic smelting.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account