Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic HistoryClayton, Joseph
History
Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic History
Clayton, Joseph
Democracy; Great Britain -- History
Robert Ket and his brother were well-known men. Both were craftsmen,
Robert, a tanner, and William, a butcher. They were landowners besides,
and men of substance and of old family, for it was said the Kets had
been in the land since the Norman Conquest. Robert Ket held three
manors from the Earl of Warwick; his yearly income was put down at £50,
and his property valued at 1,000 marks. Like other landowners, the Kets
had made enclosures, but on the arrival of the people from Hetherset
they at once declared themselves willing to stand by the movement for
freeing the land. Robert Ket felt the misery of his neighbours. He
saw that if the revolt was to be anything more than a local riot it
must have necessary guidance, and his sympathies were entirely on the
democratic side. And so from that time forward he gave up the quiet of
a country gentleman’s life at Wymondham for the strenuous movement of
an insurgent camp.
To the appeal of the people for help, Ket answered passionately, “I
am ready, and will be ready at all times, to do whatever, not only to
repress, but to subdue the power of great men. Whatsoever lands I have
enclosed shall again be made common unto ye and all men, and my own
hands shall first perform it.”
Then Robert Ket went on to commit himself body and soul to the
movement, resolved that the peasants should not be left unaided in the
struggle they had begun, and willing to take upon himself the burden
and responsibility of leadership.
“You shall have me, if you will, not only as a companion, but as a
captain; and in the doing of the so great a work before us, not only as
a fellow, but for a leader, author and principal.”
If the ambition which clutches at sovereignty and rule is despicable,
even more despicable is the weakness which refuses to take command at
times of peril.
To Robert Ket and his brother there was no promise of the world’s
honour and glory should the rising be successful. At the best would
be the satisfaction of a battle fought and won for the deliverance of
long-suffering peasants. At the worst the laying down of life in a good
cause, as Geoffrey Litster and many a Norfolk man had done in bygone
days.
Robert Ket’s leadership was acclaimed with enthusiasm, nor was it ever
disputed throughout the rising. In this, the last of the great popular
risings in England, the Norfolk men were as loyal to their leader as
the men of Kent were to Wat Tyler and Jack Cade. And in each case that
loyalty had ample justification.
There were but a thousand men involved when the rising began, but under
Ket’s command the movement passed rapidly from the fluid “running
hither and thither” condition of the first fortnight, and became the
march of an organized army.
On July 10th, two days after Ket took command, this army was on the
road to Norwich, and after crossing the river at Cringleford, lay
encamped at Eaton Wood.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account