Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic HistoryClayton, Joseph
History
Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic History
Clayton, Joseph
Democracy; Great Britain -- History
“The king seized the church at Canterbury, the mother of all England,
Scotland, and Ireland, and the neighbouring isles; he bade his officers
to make an inventory of all that belonged to it, within and without;
and after he had fixed an allowance for the support of the monks who
served God in that place, he ordered the remainder to be disposed of
at a rent and brought under his domain. So he put up the Church of
Christ to sale; giving the power of lordship over it to anyone who,
however hurtful he might be, would bid the highest price. Every year,
in wretched succession, a new rent was set; for the king would allow no
bargain to remain settled, and whoever promised more ousted him who was
paying less, unless the former tenant, giving up his original bargain,
came up of his own accord to the offer of the later bidder: and every
day might be seen, besides, the most abandoned of men on their business
of collecting money for the king, marching about the cloisters of the
monastery, heedless of the religious rule of God’s servants, and with
fierce and savage looks giving their orders on all sides; uttering
threats, lording it over every one, and showing their power to the
utmost. What scandals and quarrels and irregularities arose from this
I hate to remember. Some of the monks of the church were dispersed at
the coming of this misfortune, and sent to other houses, and those who
remained suffered many tribulations and indignities. What shall I say
of the church tenants, ground down by such wasting and misery, that one
might doubt, but that worse followed, whether escaping with bare life
they could have been more cruelly oppressed. Nor did all this happen
only at Canterbury. The same savage cruelty raged in all her daughter
churches in England, which, when bishop or abbot died, at that time
fell into widowhood. And this king, too, was the first who ordered this
woeful oppression against the churches of God; he had inherited nothing
of this sort from his father, but was alone in keeping the vacant
churches in his own hands. And thus, wherever you looked, there was
wretchedness before your eyes; and this distress lasted for nearly five
years over the Church of Canterbury, always increasing, always, as time
went on, growing more cruel and evil.”
There is no word of exaggeration in this pitiful lament of Eadmer’s.
England under William II. was at the mercy of a Norman whose notion
of absolute monarchy was to bleed the land as a subject province.
Courageous in battle he was, and skilful in arms, but utterly heedless
of the welfare of the people he ruled. It was enough for the Red King
if his demands for money were met. There was no one strong enough to
gainsay his will, or stand before him as the prophets of old stood
before the kings of Israel, until Anselm came to Canterbury. It is only
in the utterances of men like Eadmer we learn something of the misery
of the nation.[1]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account