Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc. — John Shaqi
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
The divisions of Greece are partly natural and partly accidental;
natural is that into Thessaly, Peloponnesus, and the country between the
two. This last, however, has no common name, that of _Hellas proprie
sic dicta_ is quite wrong, because it takes no notice of the islands
and colonies. The question as to whether Greece in the earliest times
had any common name or not, was discussed even by Strabo and others.
My opinion is, that the Homeric names cannot be doubted; during the
period represented by Homer, Argos is the name of the country from the
coast of Peloponnesus as far as the frontiers of Macedonia, and we may
therefore draw a distinction between Hellas and Argos. But that name
lasted only till the development of the Hellenic character.[9] The name
Ἀργεῖοι, applies to the Greeks, who had not yet separated themselves as
Hellenes; and Δαναοί seems to be the name of the Pelasgian inhabitants of
Peloponnesus. When we read in Thucydides that at the time of the Iliad,
Greeks and barbarians were not yet separated, the expression may be
variously interpreted; his opinion probably is, that in those times many
parts of Greece were inhabited by nations, such as Caucones, Leleges, and
others, which were not assimilated to the Greeks, but were distinct in
language and manners; still, however, they are comprised under the name
of Argives, i.e., Pelasgians, for Ἀργεῖοι is not a Hellenic name. The
name Ἀχαιοί is not Hellenic either, and it must be remarked in general,
that Hellenes and Pelasgians were not yet distinguished from each other,
but were vaguely comprised under one name.
In the earliest times two of those natural divisions, Peloponnesus and
Thessaly, though perfectly independent of each other, appear to have
been of primary importance. We shall first direct our attention to
Peloponnesus, as the purest Greek country, and the only one which forms
a moral and naturally united community, and shows a vigorous nation, not
only because it contained the seats and dominions of the ancient kings,
but because for a long time after, Peloponnesians possessed the supremacy
over the rest of Greece.
PELOPONNESUS.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account