Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
Herodotus divides Africa into four parts, the agricultural, the
mountainous, the country of beasts of prey, and the desert. Beyond the
river, Nigritae also are mentioned, but we must not imagine that either
this name or that of the river Niger has anything to do with _niger_,
black; it is the Punic _nahar_ which signifies “a river,” and shows the
intercourse of the Carthaginians with those countries. The same fact
has also been confirmed by the discovery of balls and staves of glass
of exquisite beauty in those parts. The art of treating glass in such a
manner as to include in a white glass a number of flowers, balls, and
other objects, without injuring the outlines, is assuredly of Phoenician
origin, and at present quite unknown. Some specimens of such glass are
found in Italy, where it was partly employed to ornament rooms, and quite
a similar piece of glasswork has been discovered in the tomb of a negro
king in Guinea, whither it had evidently been exported from Carthage.
Such pieces are said to have been used as ornaments for victors, and
there is even a tradition among the negroes, that these glass ornaments
have from time immemorial belonged to their sceptres. Servius states,
that the Romans gave to the chiefs of the Berbers ornamented sticks
instead of sceptres; the same custom still exists, but the sticks are not
adorned with silver.
The name _Marmarica_ is derived from _mar_, salt, with a reduplication
very frequent in those languages.
Among all the settlements on that Coast, CARTHAGE is by far the most
illustrious. The situation and greatness of the city are described
in the later excerpts from Diodorus of Sicily, in Strabo, and in
Appian’s Punica. One point, however, must not be lost sight of in these
descriptions, viz., the ancients assume that Carthage covered the
peninsula which was connected with the mainland by the isthmus, and that
the isthmus was cut off by means of a wall. But the fact is, that the
whole of the peninsula was not occupied by the city, which, in that case,
would have been immensely large. M. Humbert, a Dutch lieutenant, who
was long engaged in the service of the pasha of Tunis, and was a good
observer, discovered during his excavations, some years ago, the ruins
of ancient Carthage and the walls by which it was surrounded. He made an
excellent ground plan of those remains, which, however, has never been
published, but exists only in MS. According to this plan, the peninsula
contained two towns, the ancient Punic Carthage on the south side,
perhaps not occupying one-half of the peninsula, and Roman Carthage on
the other side towards Rome, which had been built by J. Caesar: lying
under the curse of Scipio, the site of the ancient city could not be
occupied by a new town. The remains of Roman Carthage are far more
numerous than those of the more ancient city; the little that is to be
seen of the latter consists of gigantic works about the harbour (Cothon).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account