Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc. — John Shaqi
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
Even in declension entire forms have been
misunderstood, but it is especially in regard to syntax that very much
remains to be done. The ancient mode of speaking occurs now and then,
and is either overlooked altogether or treated as exceptional; but it
ought to be treated with the same accuracy as, for example, the epic
dialect in Greek. In our case, e.g., the grammatical observation throws
light upon history; the Prisci Latini are the people of the thirty towns,
consisting of Priscans and Latins. The Priscans are the Oscan conquerors,
and the Latins the inhabitants of the coast, or the ancient Tyrrhenian
population. As in the genealogies of the Greeks, the Pelasgian race is
not separated, whence the heroes of the Trojan time frequently belong to
the Pelasgian genealogies, so the heroes of the Oscans also occur among
the Latins, and vice versa. Hesiod, in the well-known passage, mentions
Latinus, the son of Circe and Odysseus, as ruler of all the Tyrrhenians
(Πᾶσι Τυρσηνοῖσιν ἀγακλειτοῖσιν ἀνάσσων), understanding by Tyrrhenians
the people dwelling on the coasts, in the wide extent of ἡ Λατίνη.
These are the results of my investigations about the Latins. They are
spoken of in two senses: in the most ancient, they comprise all the
Siculians or Tyrrhenians on the western coast of Italy; in a narrower
and later sense, the Latins are a mixed people of Siculians and the
Oscans who had come down from the mountains. The great mass of the real
Latins became so amalgamated with the conquerors, that the main body
remained essentially Pelasgian; the alleged emigration[3] either does
not refer to the Latins at all, or only to a small portion of them; they
remained after the foreign conquest in such numbers, that their race did
not undergo any change, in the same manner as the Italians, after the
Lombard conquest, remained essentially Italians, although the Lombards,
who had come with their women and children were the rulers. Even a small
people may preserve its peculiar language for a long time; the Franks
perhaps had scarcely twenty thousand soldiers. Sismondi, whose judgment
is otherwise in most matters of little weight, here observes quite
correctly, that in the tenth century, the Dukes of Beneventum still had
Lombard names; thus one is called Store Seitz, “preparing seats;”[4] and
this was four centuries after the immigration of the Lombards. In like
manner, the nobles in Livonia speak Lettish, but among themselves they
speak German with a peculiar pronunciation; several of them live on their
estates, speak German and have German chaplains, being, among thousands
of Livonians, the only Germans. And yet more than five centuries have
already elapsed since they settled there.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account