Legal Chemistry: A Guide to the Detection of Poisons, Examination of Tea, Stains, Etc., as Applied to Chemical JurisprudenceNaquet, Alfred
Science
Legal Chemistry: A Guide to the Detection of Poisons, Examination of Tea, Stains, Etc., as Applied to Chemical Jurisprudence
Naquet, Alfred
Chemistry, Forensic; Poisons
The following process, suggested by _M. Orfila_, remedies this
inconvenience: The organs are placed in an evaporating dish, together
with one tenth of their weight of caustic potassa, and a quantity of
water varying with the weight of the substances taken. An amount of
nitrate of potassa equal to twice the weight of the organic matter is
next added, and the mixture evaporated to dryness. The residue is then
thrown by fragments into a Hessian crucible heated to redness, the
portions first taken being allowed to become perfectly white before more
is added.
Whichever process has been employed, the fused mass is decanted into a
porcelain crucible, which has previously been heated in order to avoid
danger of breakage. The portion remaining in the vessel is taken up by
boiling with a small quantity of distilled water, and the solution so
obtained likewise added to the crucible. The mass is then heated with
sulphuric acid until all nitrous fumes are expelled, as these could give
rise to an explosion, when, in the search for arsenic, the substance is
introduced into Marsh's apparatus. As soon as the nitric acid is
completely expelled, the liquid is allowed to cool; the greater portion
of the sulphate of potassa formed now separating out in crystals. The
fluid is next filtered and the crystalline salt remaining on the filter,
washed, at first with a little distilled water, then with absolute
alcohol, which is subsequently removed from the filtrate by boiling.
This method is scarcely applicable otherwise than in the detection of
arsenic, as in other instances the presence of a large amount of
sulphate of potassa would be liable to affect the nicety of the
reactions afterwards used. Its application, even in the search for
arsenic, is not to be strongly recommended; on the contrary, the
separation of the potassa salt by filtration is indispensable, as
otherwise a double salt of zinc and potassium, which might be formed,
being deposited upon the zinc used in Marsh's apparatus, would prevent
the disengagement of hydrogen, and every chemist is too well aware of
the difficulty of thoroughly washing a precipitate, not to fear the
possible loss of arsenic by this operation.
BY MEANS OF POTASSA AND NITRATE OF LIME.
In this method the organic materials are heated with water and 10 to 15
per cent. of caustic potassa. As soon as disintegration is completed,
nitrate of lime is added, and the mixture evaporated to dryness. A
glowing coal is then placed upon the carbonaceous residue obtained: the
mass, undergoing combustion, leaves a perfectly white residue. This
residue dissolves in hydrochloric acid to a clear fluid which is then
examined for poisons.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account