Probably its first appearance is on the Hereford map of 1275 or not
much later,[49] the inscription being “Fortunate Insulae sex sunt
Insulae Sct Brandani.” It is about on the site of the Canary group, and
the elliptical island Junonia is just below. The showing is uncertain
and conventional; also the number six misses the mark by one; still
there can be no doubt that the Canaries as a whole were intended.
Concerning them Edrisi[50] had observed, about 1154: “The Fortunate
Islands are two in number and are in the Sea of Darkness.” Perhaps he
had Lanzarote and Fuerteventura, the most accessible pair, especially
in mind. The surviving derivatives of the last eighth-century Beatus
map[51] also bear the inscription “Insulae Fortunate” where the Canary
Islands should be, but they assert nothing of “St. Brandan.” Doubtless,
dimly known, they had been reputed Isles of the Blest from prehistoric
times. If St. Brendan found them, he found them already the “Fortunate
Isles.”
A tradition long survived--perhaps survives still--in the Canary
archipelago supporting this identification by the Hereford map. Thus
Father Espinosa,[52] who long dwelt in Teneriffe and wrote his book
there between 1580 and 1590, avers that St. Brendan and his companions
spent several years in that archipelago and quotes a still earlier
“calendar,” date not given, as authority for their mighty works done
there “in the time of the Emperor Justinian.” Even as late as the
eighteenth century an expedition sailed from among them for an island
believed to be outside of those already known and to be the one
discovered by St. Brendan.
[Illustration: FIG. 2--Section, in two continuous parts, of the
Pizigani map of 1367 showing St. Brendan’s Islands, Mayda, Brazil,
Daculi, and other legendary islands. (After Jomard’s hand-copied
reproduction.)]
THE DULCERT MAP OF 1339
The second cartographical appearance of the saint’s name seems to be in
the portolan map[53] of Angelinus Dulcert, the Majorcan, dated 1339,
where three islands corresponding to those now known as the Madeiras
(Madeira, Porto Santo, and Las Dezertas) and on the same site are
labeled “Insulle Sa Brandani siue puelan.” Since “u” was currently
substituted for “v,” and “m” and “n” were interchangeable on these
old maps, the last two words should probably be read “sive puellam.”
However the ending of the inscription be interpreted, there can be no
doubt about St. Brendan and his title to the islands--according to
Dulcert. And that this island group must be identified with Madeira and
her consorts (though Madeira is named Capraria and Porto Santo is named
Primaria) hardly admits of any question.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account