Letter to the Friends and Subscribers of the Church Pastoral-Aid Society: occasioned by a letter from the Rev. Dr. MolesworthWhitefoord, Caleb, Rev.
Religion
Letter to the Friends and Subscribers of the Church Pastoral-Aid Society: occasioned by a letter from the Rev. Dr. Molesworth
Whitefoord, Caleb, Rev.
Church Pastoral Aid Society
A proposition so plain amounts, in fact, to a truism; yet it affords in
itself, to my mind, and upon Christian principles, a sufficient
vindication of the Society’s rule. Some escape the vigilance of the
Bishop at ordination; and some fall away, like the unhappy Dr. Dodd, and
others, from a state of considerable usefulness and credit. Thus it was
in the earliest ages of the Church, and in the presence of extraordinary
inspiration. A “_Demas_, _having loved this present world_,” forsook his
master: and Paul prophesied, that, after his departure from Ephesus,
“_grievous wolves_ should _enter in_, not sparing the flock.” “Also, _of
your ownselves_,” adds he, “_shall men arise_, _speaking perverse
things_, to draw away disciples after them:” Acts xx. 29, 30. Or,
without speaking of our own times, to come to times bordering upon our
own; who has not heard of an assembly of Divines of the Church of England
meeting for the purpose of obtaining relief to their consciences from
subscription to the Thirty-nine Articles, which they had already
subscribed? These were men whom the Church Pastoral-Aid Society,
Low-Church, or No-Church as it may be called, would never have supported
from its funds, nor put itself in the way of doing so. Leave it in the
hands of the Bishops to refuse their licence, is Dr. Molesworth’s
_panacea_. Dr. Molesworth would throw all upon the Bishops.—And was it,
Dr. Molesworth, not left in the hands of the Bishops at that very time,
long before any Church Pastoral-Aid Society was heard of?
I know it will be thought invidious, in more ways than one, to take the
course I do, upon this proposition. I may content myself with Dr.
Molesworth’s Apology to his Diocesan (p. 26), by affirming only with more
reason, that “the importance of the subject requires that no courtesies
should suppress _plain speaking_ upon it.” Towards the Episcopal body I
would conduct myself with the utmost deference and respect. In what I
shall say, I would refer but to the past. Are not Bishops elected at
that time of life, in a majority of cases, which would preclude them from
acting very long with the promptitude and vigour which Dr. Molesworth’s
system would require? A remark to that effect fell from the lips of good
Bishop Horne, as he ascended the steps to his episcopal palace at Norwich
for the first time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account