Letter to the Friends and Subscribers of the Church Pastoral-Aid Society: occasioned by a letter from the Rev. Dr. MolesworthWhitefoord, Caleb, Rev.
Religion
Letter to the Friends and Subscribers of the Church Pastoral-Aid Society: occasioned by a letter from the Rev. Dr. Molesworth
Whitefoord, Caleb, Rev.
Church Pastoral Aid Society
Hitherto, my object has been, to expose the _animus_ of these attacks:
though painful, it was necessary to do so, lest any one should conceive
that Dr. Molesworth, and those who think with him, are men who may be
easily satisfied; or that by giving up one point, however vital, we
should silence opposition. Does _the spirit_ displayed in their attacks
afford us any fair grounds for hoping this? Was not Lay-agency first
attacked, as _the veto_ is now? Does not the reproach of “_Lay Society_”
announce that the whole Society must be re-constituted, from the
top-stone to the bottom? In short, these gentlemen _will be satisfied_
when we have given up every thing, and have nothing more left to give up.
Bear in mind, that they have already established a Society (a Church
Society they call theirs), for the same objects, upon their own model;—I
do not say, in opposition to, but a year or more after the Pastoral-Aid
Society. One would think, if Dr. Molesworth could do justice to the
Society in any thing, it would be _as parent_ of _a child_ so hopeful, so
highly-prized, and so justly-commended by himself, as the Society for the
employment of Additional Curates &c. Standing in this relation to each
other, it is painful to learn from Dr. Molesworth the probability of
their becoming “_bitter rivals_” (p. 27). On the part of _the parent_, I
am sure, no such _unnatural_ sentiment prevails; and I trust it would
continue to be so, were the respective positions changed, and the
daughter _flourished_ as much, or more, than the mother.
Far more congenial to my feelings than the topics which have engaged us
hitherto, will be the discussion upon certain definite principles, as was
proposed, of the use of the _veto_. My first proposition was a question
of fact scarcely requiring proof; yet indeed the whole argument depends
upon it: for could it be proved that no evil men exist in the Church as
ministers, then the Society’s rule would doubtless be unnecessary,
offensive, and chargeable with party motives. But I assert,
I. That unworthy men do intrude themselves into the sacred ministry of
the Church.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account