Letters of John Huss, written during his exile and imprisonment : $b With Martin Luther's preface; and containing a general view of the works of Huss — John Shaqi
Letters of John Huss, written during his exile and imprisonment : $b With Martin Luther's preface; and containing a general view of the works of HussHus, Jan
History
Letters of John Huss, written during his exile and imprisonment : $b With Martin Luther's preface; and containing a general view of the works of Huss
Hus, Jan
Bohemia (Czech Republic) -- Church history -- Middle Ages, 600-1500 -- Sources; Christian heretics -- Czech Republic -- Bohemia -- Correspondence; Council of Constance (1414-1418 : Konstanz, Germany) -- History -- Sources; Hus, Jan, 1369?-1415 -- Correspondence; Hus, Jan, 1369?-1415. De ecclesia; Hu
In order to render more prudent, and to instruct, by means of the
tyrannical judgments of the Council of Constance, all theologians
that may be hereafter called to sit in a council of the Roman
Church.
Should any man read these letters, or hear them read, being, at the
same time, in possession of a sound intelligence, and, in the face
of God, having a regard for his own conscience, he will not, I am
convinced, hesitate to allow that John Huss was endowed with the
precious gifts of the Holy Spirit. Observe, in fact, how firmly he
clung, in his writings and his words, to the doctrines of Christ;
with what courage he struggled against the agonies of death; with
what patience and humility he suffered every indignity; and with what
greatness of soul he at last confronted a cruel death in defence
of the truth;--doing all these things alone and unaided, before an
imposing assembly of the most powerful and eminent men, like a lamb
in the midst of wolves and lions. If such a man is to be regarded as a
heretic, no person under the sun can be looked on as a true Christian.
By what fruits, then, shall we recognise the truth, if it is not
manifest by those with which John Huss was so richly adorned?
The greatest crime of John Huss was his having declared that a man of
impious life was not the head of the universal Church: he allowed him
to be the chief of a particular church, but not of the universal one;
just the same as a minister of the word, whose life is criminal, still
remains minister according to external appearance, although he is not,
on that account, a member of the saints in his church. In a similar
manner, John Huss denied that an impious and flagitious pontiff was a
worthy one, although seated on the throne of the Church; it is as if we
should declare that Judas, being both traitor and robber, was not an
honest man, although he had been called to the functions of an apostle.
Every effort, in fact, was made to prevail on John Huss to admit that
a criminal pope ought to be regarded as a saint, and was infallible;
that his words and acts were alike holy, and ought to be received and
respected as so many articles of faith. All the men of the Council of
Constance, wise as they were considered, would have lent a favourable
ear to such assertions,--they who, when they had dethroned three
culpable pontiffs, did not allow to any one the right of condemning
them to the flames! But when John Huss said the same things, they
dragged him at once to the stake!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account