Church of England -- Clergy -- Correspondence; Clergy -- England -- Correspondence; Robinson, Forbes, 1867-1904 -- Correspondence
That means to say that to help others from the inside, we must be right
inside ourselves. And yet none of us are right inside. But there is
that in us which is right, that in us which is not ourselves, but is
deeper than ourselves. A Son who will make us true sons, a Brother who
will teach us how to be brothers, a Human Being who will show us what
is in all human beings; a Love who will teach us what we always fancy
we know, but what we don't know (else we should be divine)--how to
love; a Man who will make us saints and gentlemen--the Man Christ
Jesus. Yes, and there is in us a Great Spirit who is uniting us by
invisible bonds to all that is good and healthy and Godlike, a Spirit
who disciplines our will when it is weakest and most self-indulgent,
who trains our spirit and fights our battles against the evil spirit, a
Person who makes us persons. How then do men differ? If in every man
there is the Light which lightens him, the Christ, the Spirit, what is
the difference between good and bad men? Does {62} a good man possess
religion, or faith, or love? No, the best men would tell you they were
possessed by faith and love, rather than that they possessed them.
What faith or love they have is not a possession--it is in them, not of
them, not belonging to them. It comes from the Christ in them. The
difference between men is not that one is inspired and another is not,
but that one yields to the Spirit, another does not. We begin to obey
when we lose ourselves in that Spirit and forget all but God. We ought
never to settle any detail in life without taking Him into account: we
are fools if we do. How can we be logical? For He is in that detail,
and not to think of Him is not to understand that detail. For every
detail is more than a detail--it is the expression of a Person.
I have wandered into a train of thought suggested by 'Yeast,' and in
part copied directly from it. Forgive me. I was half thinking aloud.
That is my one excuse for saying what I am trying to think.
I never played golf. I do that sort of thing by deputy. K---- is the
sort of man to do it for me. At any rate, I trust him with my football
and rowing. It doesn't tire you so much if you do it that way. Only
let me give you one piece of advice, which I only wish I acted upon:
'Don't do your thinking by deputy:' do your rowing, golf, football,
cricket, skittles, talking if you like, but not your thinking.
{63}
_To D. D. R; written apropos of a discussion on St. Paul's idea of the
relation between Sin and the Law._
2 New Square, Cambridge; Monday before Easter, 1892.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account