Church of England -- Clergy -- Correspondence; Clergy -- England -- Correspondence; Robinson, Forbes, 1867-1904 -- Correspondence
I cannot but help feeling that part of your difficulties are self-made.
Is there such a difference between Jewish law and law in general? What
is law--law in the abstract? What do you mean when you talk about laws
of science or morality? Surely there is no such thing as law in the
abstract. You really mean God's thought. All law existed long before
this world existed, as the thought of God. This thought expresses
itself, when the world is actually made, in animals, nature, man. But
this thought is somewhat long before it expresses itself, because it is
God's thought. With Him 'to think' is 'to do.' Before you and I were
born, before men were made, man exists in God as a thought. Each of us
is an expression of part of that thought. The whole thought is the
image of God, not any one part. Now, when I speak of man as something
in contra-distinction to men, I mean the thought of God in
contradistinction to its individual realisation. So when I speak of
law as distinct from special laws, I mean a thought of God as distinct
from its special expressions. Otherwise 'man' and 'law' are
abstractions and nonentities.
The nominalist is right in so far as he denies that law as an abstract
thing (considered apart from a person--as his thought) is anything: the
realist is right in so far as he affirms that law, apart from {64} any
particular manifestation, is an eternal reality. The reconciliation of
nominalism and realism is found in God. Applying this to the case in
hand--you admit that the Ten Commandments are the ground of morality;
therefore, I say, they must be an expression of a thought of God, the
Author of morality. But you are puzzled to find that the most trivial
sanitary arrangements are considered by the Jew as equally a
manifestation of God. Need we be? In every little sanitary precaution
I recognise, or ought to recognise, an expression of that same mind as
I see it in the Ten Commandments. God is Light, therefore the clean,
the healthy, the decent is an expression of Him. God is Love,
therefore the social, the self-sacrificing, is an expression of Him as
well. But sanitary arrangements and the like, though an expression of
an unchanging principle, change according to state of civilisation,
climate, country. Therefore we take the principle, not the expression,
as the ultimate reality in the case of these sanitary laws.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account