It was an Italian botanist, Giuseppe de Notaris[125], a Professor in
Florence, who took up the work where Fée had left it. His comparative
studies of both vegetative and reproductive organs convinced him of
the great importance of spore characters in classification, the spore
being, as he rightly decided, the highest and ultimate product of the
lichen plant. In his microscopic examination of the various recognized
genera, he found that while, in some genera, the spores conformed to one
distinct type, in others their diversities in form, septation or colour
gave a decisive reason for the establishment of new genera, while minor
differences in size, etc. of the spores proved to be of great value in
distinguishing species. The spore standard thus marks a new departure
in lichenology. De Notaris published the results of his researches in a
fragment of a projected larger work that was never completed. Though his
views were overlooked for a time, they were at length fully recognized
and further elaborated by Massalongo[126] in Italy, by Norman[127] in
Norway, by Koerber[128] in Germany and by Mudd[129] in our own country.
Massalongo had drawn up the scheme of a great _Scolia Lichenographica_,
but like de Notaris, he was only able to publish a part. After twelve
years of ill-health, in which he struggled to continue his work, he died
at the early age of 36.
Lindsay[130], Mudd and Leighton[131] were at this time devoting great
attention to British lichens. Lauder Lindsay’s _Popular History of
British Lichens_, with its coloured plates and its descriptive and
economic account of these plants has enabled many to acquire a wide
knowledge of the group. Mudd’s _Manual_, a more complete and extremely
valuable contribution to the subject, followed entirely on the lines
of Massalongo’s work. From his large experience in the examination
of lichens he came to the conclusion that: “Of all organs furnished
by a given group of plants, none offer so many real, constant and
physiological characters as the spores of lichens, for the formation of a
simple and natural classification.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account