Life and literature in the Roman republicFrank, Tenney
History
Life and literature in the Roman republic
Frank, Tenney
Latin literature -- History and criticism; Rome -- Intellectual life
We have perhaps a fairer quarrel with him for following the Greek
custom of inserting fictive speeches in the body of his work. To the
modern reader many of them are tedious and create a suspicion of being
unreliable. It is never quite safe to quote a line from these speeches
as indisputable evidence on any event, though most of them contain the
gist of an actual speech delivered on the occasion stated. All we can
usually be sure of is that they give Livy’s conception of what was likely
to have been said by the speaker in the situation. That is often worth
having, for Livy usually knew more of the pertinent conditions than we
do and he possessed a sympathetic penetration into pristine characters
and events that enabled him to make valuable reconstructions. One has
only to read the several speeches attributed to Scipio Africanus to see
that they make a consistent and vivid portrait. If we have the patience
to read these speeches with Livy’s purpose in mind we shall know how to
profit by them. The convention was of course understood, and was no more
misleading than the equally artificial convention of modern historians
who employ a kind of fictional mind-reading, a “stream of consciousness”
device, which may be found on almost any page of Mommsen or De Sanctis.
Mommsen could hardly have made a silent character like Caesar real
without constantly conjecturing as to his intentions and motives, as when
he writes: “Evidently here too it was Caesar’s intention,” or again “When
Caesar projected the plan for a new code, it is not difficult to divine
his intentions” (and he puts down a page of divining), or again, “So far
Caesar might say that his object was attained.” These musings of a great
historian of our time are cast in a different form from the invented
harangues of Livy and the Greeks, but we read them with the same caution,
knowing that they are surmises. The historian, who like Livy and Mommsen
must deal with tantalizingly fragmentary sources, must have the liberty
to bridge the lacuna by some such method. But we will be on our guard
when reading such matter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account