Life and literature in the Roman republicFrank, Tenney
History
Life and literature in the Roman republic
Frank, Tenney
Latin literature -- History and criticism; Rome -- Intellectual life
All this resulted of course in a severe reaction not unlike the puritanic
wave that swept over England after the catalysis of Elizabethan
prosperity. Cato supported by many of the conservative nobles undertook
to lead the revolt against philhellenism on every possible score. He
attacked the foreign policy of the Scipios, which in his opinion wasted
Rome’s youth and resources without compensation for a sentimental cause,
and the Scipionic group was accordingly stripped of political power.
He attacked the returning generals for permitting the soldiers to be
debauched by Greek vices; he directed an attack against the Bacchanalian
cult till the senate passed a bill inflicting the death penalty upon
those who persisted in furthering the cult; he used all the power of his
censorship to degrade senators who had yielded to new customs and to
conduct a rigid examination of the plate, furniture, and table expenses
of his opponents.
Of course this drastic reform movement could not stop the cultural
changes that were bound to come. Skepticism and sophistication can hardly
be banished by legislation and law courts; but the outward signs of the
new culture were for a season obscured. There is no doubt that Greek
literature became less popular in the latter days of Cato. Such books
as the “Sacred History” of Euhemerus were not again translated for a
long time. Those who wished to read Greek poetry and philosophy had to
confine themselves for many years to the originals; to put those things
into Latin, to translate, paraphrase, or to write similar things in
Latin, was not encouraged. Greek rhetoric might still be taught for the
comprehension of Greek authors, but to put the Greek rules of rhetoric
into Latin for general use was frowned upon. Greek tragedy in Roman
adaptations—by Ennius and Pacuvius—had been established at the festivals
so long that they remained, and, as adapted to the moral tone of the
Romans by those dramatists, there could be little objection to them.
But the efforts begun by Scipio Africanus to encourage such plays by
making them as inviting as possible to senators bore little fruit. The
permanent theater, for which a contract had been let by the censors ten
years after Cato’s crusade, was not completed, and when another effort
was made to complete it twenty years later the senate had it torn down.
Translated Greek comedies were still permitted at the festivals, but it
was necessary to indicate that the scene was Greek and not Roman. Latin
comedies, togatae—from our point of view not a whit better in morals—then
came into fashion. To draw the crowd the authors were permitted a certain
freedom of expression but here at least the vices were Roman and hence
pardonable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account