Life and literature in the Roman republicFrank, Tenney
History
Life and literature in the Roman republic
Frank, Tenney
Latin literature -- History and criticism; Rome -- Intellectual life
An independent creator he was and might have carried progress far had
not so large a part of his activity fallen in the restraining period
of the Second Punic War. His end was in character. Accustomed to speak
his mind freely in his comedies, he vigorously supported the Fabian
policy when it was unpopular, and after the group supporting Scipio,
which demanded a more aggressive conduct of the war, came into power, he
continued his sarcastic criticism of the Scipionic group. Rome had always
tolerated free speech, but even at Rome patience was short in war time.
War censorship discovered an old law which, with a little imaginative
interpretation, could be stretched to cover the case of this satirist.[1]
Only one line has survived of the satiric comedy which referred to
the fact that Metellus, a friend of Scipio’s, had taken advantage of
a fortuitous circumstance to stand for the consulship. He was elected
through no desert of his own. The point of the line—Fato Metelli Romae
fiunt consoles—rests on a _double entendre_, because _fato_ may be
construed either as ablative or as dative, while _Romae_ may be genitive
or locative. The line therefore may mean either:
“The Metelli became consuls at Rome by chance,”
which is hardly a flattering remark, or what is even less flattering:
“The Metelli became consuls to Rome’s sorrow.”
The Metelli apparently thought Naevius meant to suggest both, which
is likely enough, and they succeeded in having him imprisoned, and
eventually banished. He seems to have found a home in Carthage, the land
of the enemy against whom he had once fought.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account