Canada -- Social life and customs; Ontario -- Description and travel
(By permission from the J. Ross Robertson collection.)
]
[Illustration: KITCHEN UTENSILS. UPPER CANADA, 1813.
(By permission from the J. Ross Robertson collection.)
]
roll it to the back side of the fire. Since matches were not then
invented, the fire was something to be closely guarded, lest it might go
out. But this big back-log would usually keep a fire on for some three
or four days, being covered up at night with the ashes and embers that
it might smoulder all the night.
Wild leeks were then used as an article of food. As soon as the snow
disappeared in the spring they would be found in abundance in the
forests, and were gathered as the first spring vegetable. Their unsavory
smell, or that imparted to the breath of the eater thereof, seemed to be
no bar to their use. When all partook of the leek not one could detect
the odor from the other. Likewise the cowslip, a little later in the
season, which grew in shallow ponds, furnished a dish of greens to our
forefathers.
To show how difficult it was at this early day for the poor settler to
obtain money, I will relate an anecdote of about 1807. Levi Annis was
living at this time with his father, in the county of Durham. During the
summer and fall of 1806 they had chopped and burnt a fallow of
thirty-one acres, which they sowed with fall wheat. As a preparation for
sowing, the land was not ploughed at all, but it was loose and leafy and
ashy from the burning. The wheat was sown broadcast by hand among the
stumps. It was covered by hitching a yoke of oxen to the butt end of a
small tree, with the branches left hanging thereto. The oxen drew this
to and fro over the fallow among the stumps, and thus covered the wheat.
This was called “bushing in,” and was the first harrow used by our
forefathers among the stumps. However, the fallow upon which the wheat
was so brushed in produced as fine a crop of fall wheat as ever grew,
falling not much below thirty bushels per acre. Now this wheat could be
exchanged for store goods at will, but not for money. Levi Annis,
however, took the first load of it to Bowmanville, and was told by his
father that he must get $5.50 on account of the whole crop to pay his
taxes, for he must have the money to pay his taxes, but the rest he
would take store pay for. The merchant with whom he dealt actually
refused to advance the $5.50, saying he could get all the wheat he
wanted for goods. The young man had to drive to another merchant and
state his deplorable case to him and his urgent need of $5.50, and that
if he would advance him the money he should have the whole crop of
thirty-one acres. Finally the second merchant took pity upon the young
man in his dilemma and advanced the money. Thus it was with the utmost
difficulty that he could get $5.50 in cash out of thirty-one acres of
wheat. This shows us to-day how difficult it was for our forefathers to
get money.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account