Living Fountains or Broken Cisterns: An Educational Problem for ProtestantsSutherland, E. A. (Edward Alexander)
Religion
Living Fountains or Broken Cisterns: An Educational Problem for Protestants
Sutherland, E. A. (Edward Alexander)
Church and education; Education -- History; Religious education
The same paragraph in Neander continues: “To their school were attracted
not only those educated pagans, who, having by their teaching been
converted to Christianity, and being seized with a desire to devote
themselves and all they possessed to its service, chose ... the
Alexandrian catechists for their guides, but also _those youths_, who,
having been brought up within the Christian pale, were thirsting after a
more profound knowledge, in order to prepare themselves for the office of
_church teachers_.”[72]
[Sidenote: Opposing voices]
This school did not find its pathway always strewn with roses; for there
were church teachers of the primitive class “who looked chiefly to the
practical and real, ... and who were in continual dread of a corruption
of Christianity by the admixture of foreign philosophical elements,” and
these offered some opposition to the transit from an education of faith
in God’s Word to one of scientific investigation and reason.
[Sidenote: Clement’s justification]
Those were days of lively debate, and the defenders of Christian
education more than once contended for its principles. “‘Thus much,’
observes Clement, ‘I would say to those who are so fond of complaining:
if the philosophy is unprofitable, still the study of it is profitable,
if any good is to be derived from thoroughly demonstrating that it is an
unprofitable thing.’” This argument is indulged in at the present time by
those who espouse the cause of modern education, and wish to defend the
study of the classics and the doctrine of evolution.
The words of Clement in his arguments sound doubly striking, when we
remember that to-day the feeling that the education of the senses
will ultimately tend to the grasping of eternal truth by faith is
just as firmly held as then, notwithstanding the fact that a careful
investigation shows that this can never be the case, and that the only
avenue to _truth_ is through faith, first, last, and all the time. He
says: “Perhaps the latter [philosophy] was given to the Greeks in a
special sense, as preliminary to our Lord calling the Gentiles, since it
educated them as the law did the Jews, for Christianity; and philosophy
was a preparatory step for those who were to be conducted through Christ
to perfection.”[73]
[Sidenote: Clement lost his faith]
Accordingly, we find Clement perpetually verging toward the gnostic or
platonic position. “With an idea of faith which flowed from the very
essence of Christianity, there was associated in his mind the still
lingering notion, derived from the Platonic philosophy, of an opposition
between a _religion of cultivated minds_, and arrived at by the medium of
science, and a religion of the many, who were shackled by the senses and
entangled in mere opinion.”[74]
[Sidenote: Birth of the papacy]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account