Living Fountains or Broken Cisterns: An Educational Problem for ProtestantsSutherland, E. A. (Edward Alexander)
Religion
Living Fountains or Broken Cisterns: An Educational Problem for Protestants
Sutherland, E. A. (Edward Alexander)
Church and education; Education -- History; Religious education
Here is distinctly seen the beginnings of that system of education which
elevates the few and holds the masses in subjection. Herein lies the
wellspring of a monarchical government and a papal hierarchy. It was the
propagation of the system of education introduced into the Alexandrian
school by Clement that formed the papacy. We are not surprised to
read in history of the contest between the churches of Alexandria,
Constantinople, and Rome. Rome as arbiter was called to decide between
the Greek Catholics and the Alexandrians; and from the downfall of both
her rivals she gained the pontifical throne; but it was only to crown
the educational ideas of the Alexandrian school, and sway the world by
the enforcement of the principles of that system of instruction _which
substitutes scientific research for faith_.
God had once called his people out of Egypt; but the church, forsaking
the purity of the gospel, returned thither for its education. The
Reformation was its second call, and to-day the third call is sounding.
Having followed with some care the ideas first introduced by Clement,
and finding that the result of the position taken by this teacher was
that faith was destroyed and scientific reason substituted, we turn to
the further development of this educational idea as advocated by one of
Clement’s most noted pupils and his successor in the Alexandrian school.
I refer to Origen.
[Sidenote: Origen]
Origen was born 185 A.D., in Alexandria; he received a most liberal
education, and was initiated at an early age into Hellenic science and
art; the principles of Christianity were instilled into his mind by such
teachers as Clement of Alexandria.[75] “He says himself that it was an
outward motive that first led him to busy himself with the study of
Platonic philosophy, and to make himself better acquainted generally with
the systems of those who differed from himself. _The moving cause was his
intercourse with heretics and pagans who had received a philosophical
education._”
“Attracted by his great reputation, such persons” came often to him, and
he thus defends himself for bestowing his time on the Greek philosophy:
“When I had wholly devoted my time to the promulgation of the divine
doctrines, and the fame of my skill in them began to be spread abroad,
so that both heretics and others, such as had been conversant with the
Greek sciences, and particularly men from the philosophical schools,
came to visit me, it _seemed to me necessary that I should examine the
doctrinal opinions of the heretics, and what the philosophers pretended
to know of the truth_.”[76]
These facts concerning Origen are given because the argument is
strikingly similar to that used by many ministers and teachers of the
present day, and because it shows how the Platonic philosophy gained such
a foothold in so-called Christian schools, and grew into the papacy.
[Sidenote: Representatives of three systems]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account