Living Fountains or Broken Cisterns: An Educational Problem for ProtestantsSutherland, E. A. (Edward Alexander)
Religion
Living Fountains or Broken Cisterns: An Educational Problem for Protestants
Sutherland, E. A. (Edward Alexander)
Church and education; Education -- History; Religious education
There are three individuals who stand as representatives of three
systems of education. PLATO personifies heathen philosophy; CHRIST said
of Himself, “I am the ... truth;” ORIGEN personifies the mixture of the
two,—truth and error,—and hence stands, from an educational standpoint,
as _the father of the papacy_, which is the mystery of iniquity. It
behooves us now to follow carefully the work of this man. After doing so,
one can more readily understand why the beast is represented as having
several heads.[77]
[Sidenote: Faith displaced by speculation]
I quote extensively from Mosheim: “The principal doctrines of
Christianity were now explained _to the people_ in their native purity
and simplicity, without any mixture of abstract reasonings or subtile
inventions; nor were the feeble minds of the multitude loaded with a
great variety of precepts. But the CHRISTIAN DOCTORS who had applied
themselves to the study of letters and philosophy, soon abandoned the
frequented paths, and _struck out into the devious wilds of fancy_. The
Egyptians distinguished themselves in this new method of explaining the
truth. They looked upon it as a noble and glorious task to bring the
doctrines of celestial wisdom into a certain subjection to the precepts
of their philosophy, and to make deep and profound researches into the
intimate and hidden nature of those truths which the divine Saviour had
delivered to his disciples. ORIGEN WAS AT THE HEAD OF THIS SPECULATIVE
TRIBE. This great man, enchanted by the charms of the _Platonic
philosophy_, set it up as the test of all religion, and imagined,
that the reasons of each doctrine were _to be found in that favorite
philosophy, and their nature and extent to be determined by it_. It must
be confessed that he handled this matter with modesty and with caution;
but he still gave an example to his disciples, the abuse of which could
not fail to be pernicious, and under the authority of which, they would
naturally indulge themselves without restraint in every wanton fancy.
And so, indeed, the case was; for the disciples of Origen, breaking
forth from the limits fixed by their master, _interpreted, in the most
licentious manner_, the divine truths of _religion according to the
tenor of Platonic philosophy_. From these teachers the _philosophical or
scholastic theology_ derives its origin.”[78]
[Sidenote: Beginning of higher criticism]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account