Londinium, Architecture and the CraftsLethaby, W. R. (William Richard)
History
Londinium, Architecture and the Crafts
Lethaby, W. R. (William Richard)
England -- Antiquities, Roman; London (England) -- Antiquities, Roman; Romans -- England -- London
The last word is Farewell. I have felt some doubt as to this really
pretty little work being a London antiquity. My sketch is given from
Archer’s drawing. Although he may have restored it to some degree, it is
probable that it has suffered from decay since he drew it. Other Greek
inscriptions have been found in Britain.
There is another stele at the Guildhall which is so similar in several
respects to the one just described that it might have been carved in the
same shop. It is described in the catalogue as a “Monumental slab,
limestone, on which is represented a figure of a man and child; the
former is clothed in a toga, the folds of which he is holding in his
left hand; 26 × 13½ × 2¼ in.” That two slabs so much alike should be
discovered in one city, is a strong argument in favour of their having
originated there. Notice, further, how the little pediment over the
British Museum slab resembles that of the slab of the soldier first
described. Again, the wide, plain margins are like those of the
Gladiator slab. The evidence seems to be in favour of our accepting all
the four slabs described as truly London works.
In the British Museum (the Roman corridor) is a tall inscribed slab of
the headstone type, about 6½ ft. high (Fig. 44). We may see clearly that
it is a descendant of the steles by noting a few little points. It has
the side pilasters and a pediment on which some lumps carry on the
tradition of acroteria. An inscription occupies the field where the
steles have sculptured reliefs, and a lower space is occupied by a
festoon. From the inscription, NA ATIENI, it seems that it commemorated
a man born in Athens. This slab is especially like a large stele at
Cirencester which had two panels, the upper one having a relief and the
lower an inscription. Proportions, pilasters, pediment are all like our
London slab. Haverfield assigned the Cirencester slab to the end of the
first century, and the London one can only be a little later. The
inscription terminates with the early formula: H[IC] S[ITUS] EST.
[Illustration:
FIG. 44.
]
This slab is much weathered and it stands at the Museum in a bad light,
where it is difficult to make out the details. Running stems, with
flowers on the pilasters, are quite pretty (Fig. 45), and, indeed, the
whole thing has dignity. The lettering was free and doubtless more
elegant than the painted forms now suggest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account