Londinium, Architecture and the Crafts — John Shaqi
Londinium, Architecture and the CraftsLethaby, W. R. (William Richard)
History
Londinium, Architecture and the Crafts
Lethaby, W. R. (William Richard)
England -- Antiquities, Roman; London (England) -- Antiquities, Roman; Romans -- England -- London
The only London vault which I can find mentioned is one found exactly
two hundred years since at St. Martin-in-the-Fields. A Minute of the
Society of Antiquaries reads: “May 2, 1722: Mr. Stukely related that the
Roman building in St. Martin’s Church was an arch built of Roman brick
and at the bottom laid with a most strong cement of an unusual
composition, of which he has got a lump. There was a square duct in each
wall its whole length, of 9 in. breadth; there were several of these
side by side: this building is below the springs on the gravel.” This
building that was an arch, with its many flues, and cement
floor—doubtless _opus signinum_—was obviously a Roman bath chamber, but
probably it was quite small.
[Illustration:
FIG. 5.
]
Evidence of the existence of fairly large vaults has been found at the
Baths of Silchester, Wroxeter and Bath. These were all constructed in a
most interesting and suggestive way of voussoirs made as hollow boxes in
the tile material. Similar box voussoirs have been discovered at
Chedworth and elsewhere.
[Illustration:
FIG. 6.
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 7.
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 8.
]
I have found two such box voussoirs in the Rochester Museum, each about
9 in. by 6 in. on the face and 5 in. on the soffit (Fig. 4). The
surfaces are roughly scored across with parallel lines forming an X.
These two tiles together show an obvious curvature; they came from a
villa at Darenth. In the Guildhall Museum I have also found a box
voussoir which is almost identical with those at Rochester. It is thus
described: “74, Flue (?) tile, red brick, the front decorated with
incised cross lines; in the centre both front and back is a circular
perforation: 9½ in. long, 6¾ in. high, 6½ in. wide.” The longest
dimension is not in the direction of the tube, and the height is greater
at one end than the other, so that the wedge form is quite apparent. The
small holes in both the larger sides were doubtless to give better hold
to the mortar in which they were set (Fig. 5). Roach Smith recorded what
must have been broken parts of similar voussoirs as found in Thames
Street in 1848 (_Journ. Brit. Archæol. Assoc._, vol. iv.), but here they
seem to have been used as waste material in building the little piers of
hypocausts. Roman builders also constructed vaults of pipes and pots set
in mortar concrete as were our box voussoirs, but I know of no British
examples. Vaults of wide span seem to have covered large chambers in the
Basilica at Verulam (see _Victoria County History_). The method of using
the box voussoirs has been well explained from the Silchester examples
by the late Mr. Fox in _Archæologia_ (cf. Fig. 6). A fragment at
Westminster Abbey is either part of a voussoir or of a short flue tile
(Fig.7).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account