People went to bed with tobacco box and pipe and candle on a table by
the bedside in case they might wake up in the night and feel inclined
for tobacco. After supper in a middle-class family, all the men and
women smoked together. Nay, it is even stated that the very children
in school took a pipe of tobacco instead of breakfast, the master
smoking with them and instructing them how to bring the smoke through
the nostrils in the fashion of the day. Tobacco was bought and sold in
pennyworths.
Every man carried a “tobacco box, steel, and touch.” Early in the
seventeenth century there are said to have been 7000 tobacconists’
shops in London. This seems incredible; perhaps there were 7000 shops
in which tobacco was sold. For instance, all apothecaries sold tobacco.
Many of the tobacco shops were of handsome appearance. A tobacco shop
had a maple block for cutting the leaf; tongs for holding the coals,
and a fire of juniper at which the pipes were lighted. Tobacco was
so cheap that a man might fill his pocket with it for twopence. Yet
over £300,000 a year was spent in London on tobacco, while there were
some—but this is impossible—who were reported to spend, habitually,
£400 a year upon tobacco alone; that is, 48,000 pocketsful every year,
or 130 pocketsful every day; which is absurd.
Expletives and oaths are changed with every generation. The
Elizabethans had, no doubt, a great many, of which the following
represent but a few. The old Catholic oaths “By’r Lady,” “By the
Mass,” and so forth, vanished with the Reformation. We now find a lot
of meaningless ejaculations, such as “God’s Wounds,” “God’s Fools,”
“God’s Dines,” “Cocke’s Bones,” “Deuce take me,” “Bones a God,”
and “Bones a me.” The now familiar “Damn” makes its appearance in
literature; but indeed it had flourished in the mouths of the people
for many generations. There is nothing really remarkable about the
swearing of the Elizabethan period.
Every merchant formerly carried a signet-ring, on which was engraved,
not his coat-of-arms, but his mark or signet. Thus, a curious
signet-ring was found lying in the bed of the river while digging
the foundations of London Bridge. At first it was believed to be Sir
Thomas Gresham’s, but that seems now to be impossible. It is engraved
in _The London and Middlesex Notebook_ (p. 195). The device contains
the initials of the owner, with an arrangement of lines probably not
intended to have any meaning except that they should be recognised as
forming part of Sir Thomas Gresham’s signet. Armed with this ring as an
introduction, a messenger could buy and sell for the merchant—it being
presumed that the ring never left its owner save to be used as a letter
of recommendation and introduction. Sometimes the signet-ring was worn
on the thumb. Other merchants’ devices are figured in the “Notebook.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account