Two cases, that of Sir George Monoux and that of Paul Wythypol,
prove that the City offices were not at this time always regarded as
desirable. In the former case, Sir George Monoux, Alderman and Draper,
was elected (1523) Mayor for the second time, and refused to serve.
He was fined £1000, and it was ordained by the Court of Aldermen that
any one in future who should refuse to serve as Mayor should be fined
that amount. In this case Monoux was permitted to retire, probably on
account of ill-health. The second case, which happened in 1537, was
that of Paul Wythypol, merchant-taylor. He was a man of some position
in the City: he had been one of the Commoners sent to confer with
Wolsey on the “amicable” loan (Sharpe, _London and the Kingdom_, vol.
i. p. 377); he attended the Coronation banquet of Anne Boleyn; he was
afterwards M.P. for the City, 1529–1536. They elected him Alderman
for Farringdon Within. For some reason he was anxious not to serve;
rather than pay the fine he got the King to interfere on his behalf.
Such interference was clearly an infringement of the City liberties;
the Mayor and Aldermen consulted Wolsey, who advised them to seek an
interview with the King, then at Greenwich. This they did, and went
down to Greenwich. When they arrived they were taken into the King’s
great chamber, where they waited till evening, when the King received
them privately. What passed is not known, but in the end Wythypol
remained out of office for a year afterwards. At the end of that time
he was again elected Alderman, and was ordered to take office or to
swear that his property did not amount to £1000. He refused and was
committed to Newgate, the King no longer offering to help him. Three
weeks later he appeared before the Court and offered to pay a fine of
£40 for three years’ exemption from office. The Court refused this
offer and sent him back to prison. Three months later—Wythypol must
have been a very stubborn person—he again appeared before the Court,
and was ordered to take up office at once or else swear that his
property was not worth £1000. If he did not, he was to be fined in a
sum to be assessed by the Mayor, Aldermen, and Common Council. He did
not take office, and it is therefore tolerably certain that he paid a
heavy fine.
In the year 1529 sat the memorable Court presided over by Cardinals
Campeggio and Wolsey, which was to try the validity of Henry’s marriage
with his brother’s widow. It was held in the great hall of the
Dominican Friars. No more important case was ever tried in an English
Court of Law, nor one which had wider or deeper consequences. Upon this
case depended the national Faith; the nation’s fidelity to the Pope;
its continued adhesion to the ecclesiastical order as it had developed
during fifteen hundred years. This trial belongs to the national
history.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account