Love Potions Through the Ages: A Study of Amatory Devices and MoresWedeck, Harry E.
History
Love Potions Through the Ages: A Study of Amatory Devices and Mores
Wedeck, Harry E.
Aphrodisiacs -- History; Erotic literature
I will tell you, Socrates, he said, what my own feeling is. Men
of my age flock together; we are birds of a feather, as the old
proverb says; and at our meetings the tale of my acquaintance
commonly is—I can not eat, I can not drink; the pleasures of
youth and love are fled away; there was a good time once, but
now that is gone, and life is no longer life. Some complain of
the slights which are put upon them by relations, and they will
tell you sadly of how many evils their old age is the cause. But
to me, Socrates, these complainers seem to blame that which is
not really at fault. For if old age were the cause, I too being
old, and every other old man, would have felt as they do. But
this is not my own experience, nor that of others whom I have
known. How well I remember the aged poet Sophocles, when in
answer to the question, How does love suit with age,
Sophocles,—are you still the man you were? Peace, he replied;
most gladly have I escaped from a mad and furious master. His
words have often occurred to my mind since, and they seem as
good to me now as at the time when he uttered them. For
certainly old age has a great sense of calm and freedom; when
the passions relax their hold, then, as Sophocles says, we are
freed from the grasp not of one mad master only, but of many.
The truth is, Socrates, that these regrets, and also the
complaints about relations, are to be attributed to the same
cause, which is not old age, but men’s characters and tempers;
for he who is of a calm and happy nature will hardly feel the
pressure of age, but to him who is of an opposite disposition
youth and age are equally a burden.
Of sexual appetite Plato declares, in Book 8 of _The Republic_:
Are not necessary pleasures those of which we can not get rid,
and of which the satisfaction is a benefit to us? And they are
rightly called so, because we are framed by nature to desire
both what is beneficial and what is necessary, and can not help
it.
True.
We are not wrong therefore in calling them necessary?
We are not.
And the desires of which a man may get rid, if he takes pains
from his youth upwards—of which the presence, moreover, does no
good, and in some cases the reverse of good—shall we not be
right in saying that all these are unnecessary?
Yes, certainly.
Suppose we select an example of either kind, in order that we
may have a general notion of them?
Very good.
Will not the desire of eating, that is, of simple food and
condiments, in so far as they are required for health and
strength, be of the necessary class?
That is what I should suppose.
The pleasure of eating is necessary in two ways; it does us good
and it is essential to the continuance of life?
Yes.
But the condiments are only necessary in so far as they are good
for health?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account