Lucifer: A Theosophical Magazine. Volume I. September 1887-February 1888.Various
Religion
Lucifer: A Theosophical Magazine. Volume I. September 1887-February 1888.
Various
Theosophy -- Periodicals
It is true that first-born children were offered in sacrifice just
as the first take of fish was returned to the waters with a lively
sense of future favours from the Typhonian power thus propitiated,
but where is the sense of talking about the thought of an
intercommunion with the divine nature through a blood-union with God
as a concept in the mind of primitive man? It is true the recognized
nature-powers, or devils of physical force, were invoked with blood,
but what was the status of these powers when the beasts of blood
were their representatives on earth, and the blood, which is the
life, was given to the Serpent, for instance, as the likeness of
life itself because it sloughed its own skin and manifested the
enviable power of self-renewal? The profounder and more fundamental
our researches, the more clearly does it become apparent that we
have been victimised by the unsuspected survival of the past in the
present, and that the veriest leavings of primitive man have been
palmed off upon us by the ignorant as sacred mysteries and
revelations guaranteed to be original and divine. Continually we
find that our errors of belief are based upon very simple truths
that have been misunderstood through a misinterpretation of
primitive matters and modes of representation by means of modern
ignorance. The blood-covenant of the aboriginal races has
undoubtedly survived and culminated as Christian in the frightful
formula, “Without blood there is no remission of sin.” Not merely
the blood of beasts or human creatures this time, but the ruddy life
and ichor of a supposed Divine Being, who was made flesh on purpose
to pour out the blood for Almighty vengeance to lap in the person of
a gory ghost of God. One of the seven primal powers in Egypt was
represented by the hawk, because it drank blood. One of the Seven in
Akkad was the vampire. And this type of blood-drinking has been
divinised at last as the Christian God.
Pindar says: “It is impossible for me to call one of the blessed
gods a cannibal.” But the Christian scheme makes the Only God a
cannibal, who offers the flesh and blood of his own Son and Very
Self as sacrificial food made sacred for his followers. Such a god
is, in two senses, _chimerical_. How natural an accompaniment is the
picture of the Crucified Christ to the Zuni saying, “My Father, this
day shalt thou refresh thyself with blood!” Such a doctrine is but
an awful shadow of the primitive past—the shadow, so to say, of our
old earth in the very far-off past—that remains to eclipse the light
of Heaven to-day, and darken the souls of men in the present through
the survival of savage spiritualism in its final Christian phase,
where the extant doctrines are little more than an ignorant
perversion of the most primitive knowledge.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account