Luck, or Cunning, as the Main Means of Organic ModificationButler, Samuel
Philosophy
Luck, or Cunning, as the Main Means of Organic Modification
Butler, Samuel
Evolution; Natural selection
Mr. Spencer would not—at least one cannot think he would—have been able
to effect the revolution which will henceforth doubtless be connected
with Mr. Darwin’s name. He had been insisting on evolution for some
years before the “Origin of Species” came out, but he might as well have
preached to the winds, for all the visible effect that had been produced.
On the appearance of Mr. Darwin’s book the effect was instantaneous; it
was like the change in the condition of a patient when the right medicine
has been hit on after all sorts of things have been tried and failed.
Granted that it was comparatively easy for Mr. Darwin, as having been
born into the household of one of the prophets of evolution, to arrive at
conclusions about the fixity of species which, if not so born, he might
never have reached at all; this does not make it any easier for him to
have got others to agree with him. Any one, again, may have money left
him, or run up against it, or have it run up against him, as it does
against some people, but it is only a very sensible person who does not
lose it. Moreover, once begin to go behind achievement and there is an
end of everything. Did the world give much heed to or believe in
evolution before Mr. Darwin’s time? Certainly not. Did we begin to
attend and be persuaded soon after Mr. Darwin began to write? Certainly
yes. Did we ere long go over _en masse_? Assuredly. If, as I said in
“Life and Habit,” any one asks who taught the world to believe in
evolution, the answer to the end of time must be that it was Mr. Darwin.
And yet the more his work is looked at, the more marvellous does its
success become. It seems as if some organisms can do anything with
anything. Beethoven picked his teeth with the snuffers, and seems to
have picked them sufficiently to his satisfaction. So Mr. Darwin with
one of the worst styles imaginable did all that the clearest, tersest
writer could have done. Strange, that such a master of cunning (in the
sense of my title) should have been the apostle of luck, and one so
terribly unlucky as Lamarck, of cunning, but such is the irony of nature.
Buffon planted, Erasmus Darwin and Lamarck watered, but it was Mr. Darwin
who said, “That fruit is ripe,” and shook it into his lap.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account