Melanchthon took no offence at the cruel execution of Sir Thomas More
or at the other acts of violence already perpetrated by Henry VIII; on
the contrary, he gave his approval to the deeds of the royal tyrant,
and described it as a commandment of God “to use strong measures
against fanatical and godless men.”[21] The sanguinary action of the
English tyrant led Luther to express the wish, that a similar fate
might befall the heads of the Catholic Church at Rome. In the very
year of Bishop Fisher’s execution he wrote to Melanchthon: “It is easy
to lose our tempers when we see what traitors, thieves, robbers, nay
devils incarnate the Cardinals, the Popes and their Legates are. Alas
that there are not more Kings of England to put them to death!”[22] He
also refers to the alleged horrors practised by the Pope’s tools in
plundering the Church, and asks: “How can the Princes and Lords put up
with it?”
In Dec., 1535, a convention of the Schmalkalden Leaguers, at
Melanchthon’s instance, begged the envoys despatched by Henry, who
were on their way to Wittenberg, to induce their master to promote the
Confession of Augsburg--unless, indeed, as they added with unusual
consideration, “they and the King should be unanimous in thinking that
something in the Confession might be improved upon or made more in
accordance with the Word of God.”[23]
Just as in the advances made by the King to Wittenberg “the main
point had been to obtain a favourable pronouncement from the German
theologians in the matter of his divorce,” so too in consenting to
discuss the Confession of Augsburg he was actuated by the thought that
this would lead to a discussion on the Papal power and the question
of the divorce, i.e. to those points which the King had so much at
heart.[24]
On the arrival immediately after of the envoys at Wittenberg they
had the satisfaction of learning from Luther and his circle, that
the theologians had already changed their minds in the King’s favour
concerning the lawfulness of marriage with a brother’s widow. Owing to
the influence of Osiander, whom Henry VIII had won over to his side,
they now had come to regard such marriages as contrary to the natural
moral law. Hence Henry’s new marriage might be considered valid. They
were not, however, as yet ready to draw this last inference from the
invalidity of the previous marriage between the King and Catherine.[25]
Luther, however, became more and more convinced that marriage with a
brother’s widow was invalid; in 1542, for instance, on the assumption
of the invalidity of such a union, he unhesitatingly annulled the
marriage of a certain George Schud, as a “devilish abomination”
(“_abominatio diaboli_”).[26]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account