Luther replied on July 24,[141] that he had not deserved that the
Landgrave should write to him in so angry a tone. The latter was
wrong in supposing, that he wanted to get his neck out of the noose
and was not doing all that he could to “serve the Prince humbly and
faithfully.” It was not no his own account that he wished to keep his
advice secret; “for though all the devils wished the advice to be made
public, I would give them by God’s Grace such an answer that they would
not find any fault in it.”
It was, so Luther says in this letter, a secret counsel as “all the
devils” knew, the keeping secret of which he had requested, “with all
diligence,” and which, even at the worst, he would be the last to
bring to light. That he, or the Prince himself, was bound to silence
by the Seal of Confession, he does not say, though this would have
been the place to emphasise it. He merely states that he knew what,
in the case of a troubled conscience, “might be remitted out of mercy
before God,” and what was not right apart from this necessity. “I
should be sorry to see your Serene Highness starting a literary feud
with me.” It was true he could not allow the Prince, who was “of the
same faith” as himself, “to incur danger and disgrace”; but, should he
disclose the counsel, the theologians would not be in a position to
“get him out of the bother,” because, in the eyes of the world, “even
a hundred Luthers, Philips and others” could not change the law; the
secret marriage could never be publicly held as valid, though valid
in the tribunal of conscience. He wished to press the matter before
the worldly authorities; but here the Prince’s marriage would never
be acknowledged; he would only be exposing himself to penalties, and
withdrawing himself from the “protection and assistance of the Divine
Judgment” under which he stood so long as he regarded it as a marriage
merely in conscience.
In this letter Luther opposes the “making public of the advice,” which
he dreaded, by the most powerful motive at his command: The result
of the disclosure would be, that “at last your Serene Highness would
be obliged to put away your sweetheart as a mere whore.” He would
do better to allow her to be now regarded as a “whore, although to
us three, i.e. in God’s sight, she is really a wedded concubine”;
in all this the Prince would still have a good conscience, “for the
whole affair was due to his distress of conscience, as we believe,
and, hence, to your Serene Highness’s conscience, she is no mere
prostitute.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account